FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W85996989> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W85996989 abstract "Human rights advocates seek to find, interpret, and communicate facts about rights violations amidst some of the most complex social, economic, and political circumstances. To meet these challenges, fact-finders have developed research procedures that increasingly draw on a wide range of interdisciplinary tools and perspectives — with a notable expansion in the use of qualitative and quantitative methods from social science during recent years. Yet there is little discussion of investigative principles, research components, and methodological standards in the human rights field — a reality that often fuels tension and uncertainty over the extent to which social scientific research standards can and should inform evolving fact-finding conventions. As a result, fundamental questions about such standards remain unaddressed. To fill this gap, this chapter offers three core contributions. First, this chapter contextualizes the discussion by presenting data concerning the methods and conventions used by researchers at Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch in the years 2000 and 2010. Second, this chapter interrogates the nature of social scientific inquiry and the degree of overlap between social science research and human rights fact-finding by comparing investigative principles, research components, and methodological standards. These comparisons reveal that social scientific research and human rights fact-finding share many common foundations and suggest that there is great potential for further convergence — especially in relation to methodological transparency. Third, drawing on some of the key distinctions between social science research and human rights fact-finding, this chapter highlights some of the methodological trade-offs that human rights investigators will likely confront when more directly considering social scientific strategies. This chapter ultimately cautions against the creation of a social science of human rights fact-finding, given the unique challenges and irreducible ethical commitments of human rights fact-finding. It instead calls for open and inclusive conversations about the most promising and appropriate standards for the evolving practice of human rights fact-finding." @default.
• W85996989 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W85996989 creator A5024801102 @default.
• W85996989 creator A5031269638 @default.
• W85996989 date "2014-07-18" @default.
• W85996989 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W85996989 title "An Emerging Fact-Finding Discipline? A Conceptual Roadmap for Social Science Methods in Human Rights Advocacy" @default.
• W85996989 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W85996989 type Work @default.
• W85996989 sameAs 85996989 @default.
• W85996989 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W85996989 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W85996989 hasAuthorship W85996989A5024801102 @default.
• W85996989 hasAuthorship W85996989A5031269638 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C2780233690 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W85996989 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C127413603 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C144024400 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C169437150 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C17744445 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C199539241 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C2780233690 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C55587333 @default.
• W85996989 hasConceptScore W85996989C94625758 @default.
• W85996989 hasOpenAccess W85996989 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W124732441 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W1969878413 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W1970979909 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W1975479539 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W1992541812 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2095231793 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2133726924 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2265847854 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2346592763 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2485187162 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2499866174 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2803474036 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2914995175 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2959692645 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W3021779521 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W3039885902 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W3209965088 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W38829204 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W802044874 @default.
• W85996989 hasRelatedWork W2122612122 @default.
• W85996989 isParatext "false" @default.
• W85996989 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W85996989 magId "85996989" @default.
• W85996989 workType "article" @default.