FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W86391051> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W86391051 abstract "Is the money allocated to institutional distance education getting the results on the back end in terms of student achievement? A literature review of cost analysis studies on distance education is presented with three themes factored out from those studies: Costs (Institutional and student costs), Reach, and Richness (cost to the student). A synopsis of a study that produced evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of three distance educations strategies ( live , video , and web ) for enhancing the science learning of 94 midwestern elementary school teachers who were participating in a five-year professional development project is referred to throughout this piece. The results of this analysis suggest there is a sliding scale when looking at cost, reach, and richness in distance education. Introduction D'Ignazio (1993) compares distance learning in education with that of the corporate world, “Businesses have been building electronic superhighways while education has been creating electronic dirt roads. And sometimes on a dirt road, it's just as easy to get out and walk.” If we are to convert dirt roads to superhighways, we must continue to ask questions and seek answers through study of both dirt roads and superhighways. For the third time in fifty years distance education has been touted as the elixir that will cure all the ills in education and training. However, what is different is that never before has this much attention, money, publicity, and hope been invested in its practice in business and education (Saba, 2001) . Funding challenges have become the number-one IT-related issue in terms of its strategic importance to the institution, its potential to become even more significant, and its capture of IT leaders' time” (Crawford, 2003) . Higher education institutions are feeling increased pressure to integrate distance courses. The justification for this pressure is primarily due to the possibility of higher student enrollment and the resulting increased revenue for the institution and for the departments from which the teaching originates. As the economy in the United States continues to slump, the demand to increase institutional revenue continues to increase exponentially. Many state governments are making up for their budget deficit by extracting the allocated funding for education. Institutions seeking innovative ways to combat costs are moving to more flexible ways of delivering teaching and learning (Archer, 1999) . Combined with the competition from for-profit institutions, the difficulty to produce quality distance courses with minimal funding, and attracting quality students is almost incomprehensible. There have been numerous cost analysis studies (Alaluusua, 1992; Archer, 1999; Branigan, 2003; Crawford, 2003; Cukier, 1997; Foreman, 2003; Hawkes, 2000; Jones, 2003; Katz, 1999; Marrett," @default.
• W86391051 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W86391051 creator A5073614643 @default.
• W86391051 date "2004-12-15" @default.
• W86391051 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W86391051 title "Investigating the Relationship between Cost, Reach, and Richness in Distance Education" @default.
• W86391051 cites W1512997398 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1522797146 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1539541080 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1552382234 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1573453741 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1595035946 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1609209748 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1725658816 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1935790162 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1973435459 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1975070149 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1983867550 @default.
• W86391051 cites W198392819 @default.
• W86391051 cites W1984454664 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2000100137 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2030131080 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2040295997 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2064083597 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2084791040 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2088663066 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2097676656 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2109534191 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2159380923 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2171226963 @default.
• W86391051 cites W217897182 @default.
• W86391051 cites W218974355 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2194987495 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2271000763 @default.
• W86391051 cites W235055113 @default.
• W86391051 cites W291362325 @default.
• W86391051 cites W2992574511 @default.
• W86391051 cites W303247755 @default.
• W86391051 cites W32057482 @default.
• W86391051 cites W336185391 @default.
• W86391051 cites W49108877 @default.
• W86391051 cites W4954961 @default.
• W86391051 cites W59544907 @default.
• W86391051 cites W332606735 @default.
• W86391051 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W86391051 type Work @default.
• W86391051 sameAs 86391051 @default.
• W86391051 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W86391051 countsByYear W863910512012 @default.
• W86391051 countsByYear W863910512020 @default.
• W86391051 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W86391051 hasAuthorship W86391051A5073614643 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C120912362 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C2776003135 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C2778582501 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C503872463 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C50522688 @default.
• W86391051 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C120912362 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C144024400 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C144133560 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C145420912 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C15744967 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C162324750 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C162853370 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C17744445 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C205649164 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C2776003135 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C2778582501 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C39549134 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C503872463 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C50522688 @default.
• W86391051 hasConceptScore W86391051C58640448 @default.
• W86391051 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W86391051 hasLocation W863910511 @default.
• W86391051 hasOpenAccess W86391051 @default.
• W86391051 hasPrimaryLocation W863910511 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2010708819 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2015789684 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2047009247 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2053163992 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2092898390 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2108536726 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2118115633 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2127526057 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2140618012 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2171447393 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2188483698 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2384535009 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2504421538 @default.
• W86391051 hasRelatedWork W2537380047 @default.

• next