FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W8661569> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W8661569 abstract "By applying the economic theories to the legal scholarship, contemporary legal studies have undergone a radical change since the advent of such an approach especially in the United States legal academies. One of the most critical arenas that the economic analysis of law is concerned with is the issues subject to study in the local government law and urban studies. One of the biggest concerns in this field is the problem of the “size”. Concepts like zoning, incorporation, annexation, consolidation and regionalism are dominating issues in this branch of legal studies. The common element in all of these issues is undoubtedly the “size” which is effecting the local governments one way or another. On the other hand, the economists have dealt with the problem of size for a long time and they always tried to find a logical relationship between the efficiency of a firm and its size. The problem of size in Urban Studies and Local Government Law literature is merged into the dichotomy of localism and regionalism.In this paper, my primary purpose is to explain the size of local governments by applying economic methods of thinking. In this regard, at first, after briefly introducing localism, I will try to show its economic inefficiencies. By emphasizing the inefficiencies of local approaches in solving regional problems in megalopolises, it will be argued that save having a regional approach, many unavoidable flaws will emerge. In this regard, I will try to show that the sources of economic inefficiencies in local approach to regional problems are multifold. First and foremost, these inefficiencies arise from the diseconomies of scale including costs of communication among municipalities, duplication of efforts and cannibalization in locally fragmented megalopolis. The other sources of inefficiencies are the tragedy of the commons and anticommons in the region, positive and negative externalities producing free riding, gentrification, environmental problems and sprawl. Last but not least, the problem of high transaction costs and hold-out problem for the municipalities to come together to contrive a solution for the regional problems will be discussed. Eventually, taking the socio-political concerns like problem of representation and paradox of voting, the sense of community and the like into account, I will argue in favor of the coexistent model of localism and regionalism, as an idea to minimize the economic inefficiencies arising from the purely local approach to regional problems in megalopolises." @default.
• W8661569 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W8661569 creator A5046665488 @default.
• W8661569 date "2009-01-01" @default.
• W8661569 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W8661569 title "Economics of Regionalism in Megalopolis" @default.
• W8661569 cites W115125121 @default.
• W8661569 cites W1551038832 @default.
• W8661569 cites W1598283819 @default.
• W8661569 cites W170982033 @default.
• W8661569 cites W1964583002 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2076664493 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2081714882 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2150679261 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2172169275 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2226396244 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2298405188 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2482566096 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2484834689 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2504188445 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2600876882 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2732464533 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2741632969 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2795934454 @default.
• W8661569 cites W2912293881 @default.
• W8661569 cites W3022471537 @default.
• W8661569 cites W3124669362 @default.
• W8661569 cites W3125078426 @default.
• W8661569 cites W4214712266 @default.
• W8661569 cites W4246563895 @default.
• W8661569 cites W4248293926 @default.
• W8661569 cites W4249235230 @default.
• W8661569 cites W4252537643 @default.
• W8661569 cites W91934818 @default.
• W8661569 doi "https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1406155" @default.
• W8661569 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W8661569 type Work @default.
• W8661569 sameAs 8661569 @default.
• W8661569 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W8661569 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W8661569 hasAuthorship W8661569A5046665488 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C148383697 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C26271046 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C2777967926 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C502581569 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W8661569 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C148383697 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C162324750 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C17744445 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C199539241 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C205649164 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C26271046 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C2777967926 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C502581569 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C555826173 @default.
• W8661569 hasConceptScore W8661569C94625758 @default.
• W8661569 hasLocation W86615691 @default.
• W8661569 hasOpenAccess W8661569 @default.
• W8661569 hasPrimaryLocation W86615691 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W1567489547 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2107733231 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2353566646 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2361275438 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2363884625 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2368509566 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2385484807 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W2468587433 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W3010956042 @default.
• W8661569 hasRelatedWork W3047615299 @default.
• W8661569 isParatext "false" @default.
• W8661569 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W8661569 magId "8661569" @default.
• W8661569 workType "article" @default.