FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W86774891> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W86774891 abstract "In my thesis I evaluate the efficaciousness of the academic discussion on the ethics of documentary filmmaking, in which scholars have presupposed and ethically evaluated a certain documentary practice. I aim to assess whether this interpretation also reflects contemporary author documentary filmmaking, which allows for documentary as a personal artistic expression. What might such a contemporary practice look like and what does it mean for the discussion of ethics? With a focus on the filmmaker-participant relationship, a participant characterized as vulnerable, ignorant on documentary filmmaking, and as having nothing to gain, the research question focused on which moral issues filmmakers and participants encounter in the everyday practice of making documentary films, strategies they choose to deal with such issues, and the extent to which the context in which this happens is relevant. I complemented the scholarly discourse by interviewing seventeen Dutch author documentary filmmakers, who mainly had strategies to add.I used these findings to design a survey in order to measure filmmakers’ experiences with such moral issues and strategies, and their contexts. Based on the analysis of 158 valid questionnaires, dominating were filmmakers’ efforts to cooperate with the participant with the interests of the film in mind, while relying on their professional position and abilities to get what they needed for the film. Conflict surfaced in various forms and can be regarded as a relevant part of the experience, as a majority of filmmakers indicated experiencing it, though to limited extents. Contextual variables could only predict small differences between filmmakers.I also interviewed four Dutch documentary participants about their experiences. I analysed their accounts by investigating what was most salient in them, and by analysing how they talked about their experiences. These case studies indicated a similar result: cooperation, communication, and trust dominate the experience, and conflict, in various forms, plays an important supporting role. All respondents at some point disagreed with the filmmaker, and all tried to affect the project and safeguard their interests. In addition, the participants’ accounts pointed to a variety of positive and negative consequences of participating in a documentary project.Through these results, a practice surfaces in which the participant is actively involved in and committed to the project; in which conflict is dispersed, local, and a recurrent but non-decisive element of the filmmaker-participant relationship; and in which communication, trust, and commitment act as a safety-net for conflict.These results merit a paradigm-shift. The discussion on an ethics of documentary filmmaking must include a participant as partial co-creator; communication as a vehicle to carry filmmaker and participant co-creatorship; and conflict as a means to negotiate and safeguard their respective interests. In this practice, ethical questions concern not in the first place the need for the filmmaker to protect the participant from harm ensuing from her representation in a documentary film, but rather the negotiation of partial co-creatorship and of the respective interests of filmmaker and participant in the process of making a mutually desired compelling film." @default.
• W86774891 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W86774891 creator A5022665824 @default.
• W86774891 date "2012-10-26" @default.
• W86774891 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W86774891 title "Participatory spaces. Negotiating cooperation and conflict in documentary projects" @default.
• W86774891 cites W1980507785 @default.
• W86774891 cites W2075367129 @default.
• W86774891 cites W2127281211 @default.
• W86774891 cites W257903173 @default.
• W86774891 cites W2593016175 @default.
• W86774891 cites W360200002 @default.
• W86774891 cites W2522259211 @default.
• W86774891 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W86774891 type Work @default.
• W86774891 sameAs 86774891 @default.
• W86774891 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W86774891 countsByYear W867748912013 @default.
• W86774891 countsByYear W867748912016 @default.
• W86774891 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W86774891 hasAuthorship W86774891A5022665824 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C153349607 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C194943564 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C199776023 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C203663800 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C24845683 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C29595303 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C519580073 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C59430087 @default.
• W86774891 hasConcept C68389820 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C107038049 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C142362112 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C144024400 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C153349607 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C166957645 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C17744445 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C194943564 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C199539241 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C199776023 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C203663800 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C205649164 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C24845683 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C2779343474 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C29595303 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C36289849 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C519580073 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C59430087 @default.
• W86774891 hasConceptScore W86774891C68389820 @default.
• W86774891 hasLocation W867748911 @default.
• W86774891 hasOpenAccess W86774891 @default.
• W86774891 hasPrimaryLocation W867748911 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W1018217906 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W1882232675 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W189085645 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2010423254 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2127534300 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2149709389 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2231418239 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2344190380 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2420395837 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2605795841 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2795857948 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2906155975 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2943620828 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2947506499 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W3081957430 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W3149116922 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W3156489703 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2471169925 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W2602627132 @default.
• W86774891 hasRelatedWork W48956348 @default.
• W86774891 isParatext "false" @default.
• W86774891 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W86774891 magId "86774891" @default.
• W86774891 workType "dissertation" @default.