FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W87277565> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W87277565 endingPage "763" @default.
• W87277565 startingPage "762" @default.
• W87277565 abstract "Introduction Orthodontists rely on esthetic judgments from facial photographs. Concordance between estimates of facial attractiveness made from lateral cephalograms and those made from clinical photographs has not been determined. We conducted a preliminary examination to correlate clinicians' rankings of facial attractiveness from standardized end-of-treatment facial photographs (Photo Attractiveness Rank) with cephalometric measurements of facial attractiveness made for the same subjects at the same time. Methods Forty-five Chinese and US orthodontic clinicians ranked end-of-treatment photographs of separate samples of 45 US and 48 Chinese adolescent patients for facial attractiveness. Separately for each sample, the photographic rankings were correlated with the values of 21 conventional hard- and soft-tissue measures from lateral cephalograms taken at the same visits as the photographs. Results Among US patients, higher rank for facial attractiveness on the photographs was strongly associated with higher values for profile angle, chin prominence, lower lip prominence, and Z-angle, and also with lower values for angle of convexity, H-angle, and ANB. Among Chinese patients, higher rank for facial attractiveness on the photographs was strongly associated with higher values for Z-angle and chin prominence, and also with lower values for angle of convexity, H-angle, B-line to upper lip, and mandibular plane angle. Chinese patients whose %lower face height values approximated the ethnic “ideal” (54%) tended to rank higher for facial attractiveness than patients with either higher or lower values for %lower face height. The absolute values of the correlations for the 7 US measures noted above ranged from 0.41 to 0.59; those of the 7 Chinese measures ranged from 0.39 to 0.49.The P value of the least statistically significant of these 14 correlations was 0.006, unadjusted for multiple comparisons. On the other hand, many cephalometric measures believed by clinicians to be indicators of facial attractiveness failed to correlate with facial attractiveness rank for either ethnicity at even the P <0.05 level, including SN-pogonion angle, lower incisor to mandibular plane angle, and Wits appraisal. Conclusions In general, there was less association than expected or desired between objective measurements on the lateral cephalograms and clinicians' rankings of facial attractiveness on sets of clinical photographs." @default.
• W87277565 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W87277565 creator A5010148571 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5010369170 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5021293751 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5052065190 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5084923939 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5084999631 @default.
• W87277565 creator A5087416397 @default.
• W87277565 date "2009-12-01" @default.
• W87277565 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W87277565 title "Editor's Summary and Q&A" @default.
• W87277565 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.08.007" @default.
• W87277565 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W87277565 type Work @default.
• W87277565 sameAs 87277565 @default.
• W87277565 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W87277565 countsByYear W872775652016 @default.
• W87277565 countsByYear W872775652021 @default.
• W87277565 countsByYear W872775652022 @default.
• W87277565 countsByYear W872775652023 @default.
• W87277565 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5010148571 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5010369170 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5021293751 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5052065190 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5084923939 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5084999631 @default.
• W87277565 hasAuthorship W87277565A5087416397 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C105702510 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C160798450 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C2777081826 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C2779881321 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C2994111384 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C31173074 @default.
• W87277565 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C105702510 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C11171543 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C126322002 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C15744967 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C160798450 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C199343813 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C2777081826 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C2779881321 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C29694066 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C2994111384 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C31173074 @default.
• W87277565 hasConceptScore W87277565C71924100 @default.
• W87277565 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W87277565 hasLocation W872775651 @default.
• W87277565 hasOpenAccess W87277565 @default.
• W87277565 hasPrimaryLocation W872775651 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W1989877516 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W1998135439 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W2011670570 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W2079936936 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W2130627068 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W2295453057 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W2602672983 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W3048767489 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W4281926642 @default.
• W87277565 hasRelatedWork W87277565 @default.
• W87277565 hasVolume "136" @default.
• W87277565 isParatext "false" @default.
• W87277565 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W87277565 magId "87277565" @default.
• W87277565 workType "article" @default.