FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W8737557> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W8737557 abstract "Ashley Woronoff RN BSN, Valerie Neary RN MSN, Darcie Shewokis RN BSN OCN , Rebecca Joiner RN-BC BSN, Maggie Hanbury RN BSN MPA CPHQ, Sharon Clark RN BSN, Gail Nelson RN MS NEA-BC, Lisa Corbett APRN CWOCN Performance Improvement Nursing Council, Hartford Hospital, Hartford CT lcorbet@harthosp.org EVALUATION What Do Nurses Want? Making Patient Safety Data Meaningful Authors: Ashley Woronoff RN BSN Valerie Neary RN MSN, Darcie Shewokis RN BSN OCN , Rebecca Joiner RN-BC BSN, Maggie Hanbury RN BSN MPA CPHQ, Sharon Clark RN BSN, Gail Nelson RN MS , Lisa Corbett APRN CWOCN, Performance Improvement Nursing Council, Hartford Hospital, Hartford CT lcorbet@harthosp.org Purpose : Engagement of the direct care RN into data collection and monitoring supports the culture of patient safety. The Performance Improvement Nursing Council (PINC) has developed and refined the translation of patient safety data utilizing unit dashboard review, intranet metric icon, and newsletters. Significance : Nurses’ appraised value, perceived significance, access and understanding of outcome data is critical to the improvement process, patient safety, and ultimately to the financial health of an institution (Jamtvedt G et al 2006, DeVos et al 2009). Strategy and Implementation : Institutional outcome data is transparent to all on intranet Metric Icon. Hospital-wide communication strategy sets structure for routine data review and messaging conducted in each department. Weekly patient safety and monthly nursing council e-newsletters remind and reinforce. Nursing Leadership streamlined dashboards and revised to volume adjusted benchmarks. Individual performance reviews were linked to attainment of unit dashboard goals. The PINC surveyed nurses for responses on: value of outcome data, impact on nursing practice, knowledge of federal regulatory agencies, methods of data presentation and distribution, perceived motivators and sustainment. Results were utilized to revise data presentation and patient safety strategies. Developments and refinements of all processes over a 3 year period are portrayed on a timeline. Evaluation: Survey results: majority of RNs were familiar with their unit-based outcome data and these data were consistently discussed at staff meetings. 85% stated that their unit utilized the data to devise specific care delivery improvements. Nurses preferred bar graphs for data presentation and cited highest motivators as recognition, unit improvements and professional responsibility. Implications for Practice : Free access to patient safety data, championed by shared governance RNs, plus the consistent interpretation through staff meetings appears to impact RNs in daily practice. Improvements in patient falls, pressure ulcers, infection rates and documentation have all been observed through this process. Helping nurses to make the link between their day to day delivery of patient care, and improved outcomes connected to financial and regulatory strength will sustain quality healthcare. References: Baernholdt M, Jennings BM, Merwin E & Thornlow, D.(2010) What does quality care mean to nurses in rural hospitals? Journal of Advanced Nursing. 66(6), 1346-1355. Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services http://www.cms.gov/HospitalQualityInits/downloads/HospitalRHQDAPU200808.pdf accessed 6/05/11 DeVos M et al (2009) Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 21(2) 119-129. Frith KH, Anderson F Sewell JP (2010) Assessing and selecting data for a nursing services dashboard. Journal of Nursing Administration.40(1):10-6. Jamtvedt G et al (2006) Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. : CD000259. 2009 201" @default.
• W8737557 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W8737557 creator A5020322238 @default.
• W8737557 date "2013-01-01" @default.
• W8737557 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W8737557 title "What Do Nurses Want? Making Patient Safety Data Meaningful" @default.
• W8737557 cites W1537083508 @default.
• W8737557 cites W2009696174 @default.
• W8737557 cites W2105501846 @default.
• W8737557 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W8737557 type Work @default.
• W8737557 sameAs 8737557 @default.
• W8737557 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W8737557 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W8737557 hasAuthorship W8737557A5020322238 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C110875604 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C136764020 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C2522767166 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C2778059363 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C2779328685 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C33499554 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W8737557 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C110875604 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C136764020 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C15744967 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C159110408 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C160735492 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C17744445 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C199539241 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C2522767166 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C2778059363 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C2779328685 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C33499554 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C41008148 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C509550671 @default.
• W8737557 hasConceptScore W8737557C71924100 @default.
• W8737557 hasLocation W87375571 @default.
• W8737557 hasOpenAccess W8737557 @default.
• W8737557 hasPrimaryLocation W87375571 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W1533047105 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2004663914 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2024499720 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2062970825 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2068771412 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2084032492 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2091569158 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2110520755 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2112503488 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2162427040 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2226896144 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2263813520 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2313966404 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2395638771 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2417093908 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2592210126 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2597782056 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W2605788233 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W3083272167 @default.
• W8737557 hasRelatedWork W454389926 @default.
• W8737557 isParatext "false" @default.
• W8737557 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W8737557 magId "8737557" @default.
• W8737557 workType "article" @default.