FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W881314250> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W881314250 startingPage "359" @default.
• W881314250 abstract "This paper draws upon twelve years of multi-dimensional research and focuses on the reception of restorative justice in the criminal justice system in Nova Scotia. The paper traces the evolution of the restorative justice social movement, examining the launching and take-off phases, the impact on the police gate-keeping role, the receptivity and use of restorative justice by other criminal justice system professionals, its current level of institutionalization in the criminal justice system, and its future prospects.Cet article s'inspire de douze annees de recherche multidimensionnelle et traite plus particulierement de la reception accordee a la justice reparatrice dans le systeme de justice penale en Nouvelle-Ecosse. Il suit l'evolution du mouvement social en faveur de la justice reparatrice, examine les phases de son lancement et de son demarrage ainsi que son impact sur le role de repression de la police, la receptivite et l'utilisation de la justice reparatrice par d'autres professionnels du systeme de justice penale, son niveau d'institutionnalisation actuel dans le systeme de justice penale et ses perspectives pour l'avenir.IntroductionI. The gatekeeper roleII. Restorative justice: the launching yearsIII. Initial criminal justice system receptivity: the wallIV. Criminal justice system receptivity at the restorative justice take-off stageV. Restorative justice evolution in the Nova Scotia criminal justice system: referrals and offences referredVI. Restorative justice's evolution in the criminal justice system: institutionalizationVII. Current criminal justice system perspectivesConclusionIntroductionThe Nova Scotia Restorative Justice Program (NSRJ) came into being in 1999-2000 as a result of effective moral entrepreneurship,1 stimulated by restorative justice-related initiatives elsewhere, and after almost two years of discussion and planning among provincial leaders in policing, prosecution, judiciary, and corrections.2 It is regarded as one of the best criminal justice system-initiated restorative justice programs in Canada. The NSRJ program was set up to be applicable at all levels of the criminal justice system, with restorative justice referrals possible at four entry points, namely: pre-charge, post-charge, post-conviction, and postsentencing.3 On paper at least, restorative justice could apply to all offences and offenders, beginning with youths and subsequently being expanded to include adults. Its strengths organizationally are many: provincewide programming; secure, substantial, long-term governmental funding generous for a small so-called have-not province; collaboration with local non-profit agencies who deliver the service while the provincial NSRJ management provides coordination, protocols and training; and complete funding for the agencies' full-time staff. It has also partnered with and contributed significantly to the success of the province-wide Aboriginal restorative justice program.4 Its impact, measured in terms of conventional criminal justice system evaluation concerns, has been impressive: less recidivism than in similar, court processed cases; high levels of satisfaction among all categories of participants in the restorative justice sessions (offenders, victims, supporters, police attendees and others); and diversion of roughly thirty-three per cent of all cases of youth arrest from the court processing stream.5 The NSRJ program has evolved over the past decade-partly as a result of its effective institutionalization in the Nova Scotian criminal justice system and partly as a result of federal legislation and policies (e.g., the Youth Criminal Justice Act (YCJAJ and subsequent court interpretations). Now restorative justice referrals are as likely to come from crown prosecutors as from the police, where the anticipated extension of restorative justice to adults is underway throughout Nova Scotia, and where its success has stimulated restorative justice/restorative practices initiatives in provincial prisons and beyond the criminal justice system in schools' human rights cases and other areas of social life. …" @default.
• W881314250 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W881314250 creator A5031395280 @default.
• W881314250 creator A5034042705 @default.
• W881314250 date "2013-10-01" @default.
• W881314250 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W881314250 title "Getting Past the Gatekeepers: The Reception of Restorative Justice in the Nova Scotian Criminal Justice System" @default.
• W881314250 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W881314250 type Work @default.
• W881314250 sameAs 881314250 @default.
• W881314250 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W881314250 countsByYear W8813142502016 @default.
• W881314250 countsByYear W8813142502019 @default.
• W881314250 countsByYear W8813142502020 @default.
• W881314250 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W881314250 hasAuthorship W881314250A5031395280 @default.
• W881314250 hasAuthorship W881314250A5034042705 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C102587632 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C139621336 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C185052227 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C2549261 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C2781330901 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C2988919728 @default.
• W881314250 hasConcept C73484699 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C102587632 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C139621336 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C144024400 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C17744445 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C185052227 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C199539241 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C2549261 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C2781330901 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C2988919728 @default.
• W881314250 hasConceptScore W881314250C73484699 @default.
• W881314250 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W881314250 hasLocation W8813142501 @default.
• W881314250 hasOpenAccess W881314250 @default.
• W881314250 hasPrimaryLocation W8813142501 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W1558904228 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W1584205840 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W1599591445 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W1847334185 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2004454964 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2016801605 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2132298735 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2149503233 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2245116193 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2284449897 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W230535757 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2435701716 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2898148477 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W3199310311 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W3199554138 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W378300600 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W618539258 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W623938656 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W1508544176 @default.
• W881314250 hasRelatedWork W2943595667 @default.
• W881314250 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W881314250 isParatext "false" @default.
• W881314250 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W881314250 magId "881314250" @default.
• W881314250 workType "article" @default.