FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W884996454> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W884996454 abstract "This paper attempts to bridge ~ major gap in the joint venture research literature by pre$enting simple, yet robust aodel of the process by which fir•s select joint venture partners. The •odel should enhance understanding not only of this particular process, but of the l~rger do•ain of strategic alli~nces and interfirm collaboration in general. A ODEL OF THE JOINT VENTURE PARTNER SELECTION PROCESS Joint ventures !JVsl have long been recognized as viable option for enhancing the attainment of •any strategic objectives, and lately they appear to be enjoying resurgence of interest. Yet, many JVs have been characterized by some degree of disappointment for one or aore of the participating parties. Despite the potential benefits of JVs, the gains often do not seem to be fully realized by the partners. Often, suboptimal perfor•ance is attributed, fully or in part, to perceived deficiencies of the partner!sl. The implication is that •ore effective partner selection may offer potential strategic benefits by helping to avoid or reduce these perceived shortcomings. As •ight be expected, joint ventures have been the subject of large and ever-expanding volume of scholarly research. However, despite relatively extensive literature on JVs, there is very little published information on one specific facet of this topic--the process by which organizations select JV partners. Yet, by helping determine what resources will be available to the JV, the choice of specific partner •ay critically impact the ability of partners to effectively i•pleaent JV strategy, thereby potentially influencing the venture's perfor•ance, the co•petitive position of the partners, and ultiaately, the structure and perforaance within and between industries. Therefore, it seeas i•perative that the relevant stakeholders, including potential partners, existing and potential co•petitors, suppliers, custoaers, and public policy •akers, itter alia, atteapt to develop an understanding of the •echanis• by which joint venture A Model of the Joint Venture Partner Selection Process 2 partners are selected, including identification of key v~ri~bles which may influence this process and the anticipated effects such variables aay produce. The purpose of this paper is to help bridge gap in the research literature by presenting model of the process by which firms select JV partners. Effective developaent and refinement of such ~ aodel should yield not only greater understandng of this process in particular, but ~lso significant insights into the entire phenomenon of JVs and strategic alliances in general. Development of the aodel was facilitated by data collected in interviews with over 100 senior executives with i~ti•ate involve•ent in the selection of partners for over 250 joint ventures. These data were supplemented with analysis of published case studies and other research examining JVs. After defining the concept of joint venture, the literature ex~•ining the process of JV partner selection will be reviewed. The paper will then discuss the principal components of the partner selection process <PSPl model and provide an overview of the process' functioning. The paper concludes with discussion of several conclusions regarding the aodel. DEFINITION OF JOINT VENTURE Prior studies have eaployed the concept of •joint venture• in nu•erous ways, ranging fro• very narrowly defined scope to very broad characterizations incorporating virtually any for• of interfir• (and so•etiaes intrafira) collaboration. This paper will borrow fro• Geringer (1986:3) in defining joint venture as a discrete entity created by two or •ore legally distinct organizations <the partners), each of which contributes less than 100" @default.
• W884996454 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W884996454 creator A5090572777 @default.
• W884996454 date "1987-01-01" @default.
• W884996454 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W884996454 title "A Model of the Joint Venture Partner Selection Process" @default.
• W884996454 cites W10348400 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1038957120 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1450963373 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1498488428 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1504129344 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1928536794 @default.
• W884996454 cites W1984162986 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2001603472 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2014795105 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2037894668 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2062468784 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2113928312 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2313563931 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2334962475 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2983183399 @default.
• W884996454 cites W636482652 @default.
• W884996454 cites W931694272 @default.
• W884996454 cites W2335126140 @default.
• W884996454 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
• W884996454 type Work @default.
• W884996454 sameAs 884996454 @default.
• W884996454 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W884996454 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W884996454 hasAuthorship W884996454A5090572777 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C170154142 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C18555067 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C2779628136 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C2983292776 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C40700 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C54750564 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C81917197 @default.
• W884996454 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C111919701 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C127413603 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C144133560 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C154945302 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C15744967 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C162853370 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C170154142 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C18555067 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C2779628136 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C2983292776 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C40700 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C41008148 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C54750564 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C77805123 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C81917197 @default.
• W884996454 hasConceptScore W884996454C98045186 @default.
• W884996454 hasLocation W8849964541 @default.
• W884996454 hasOpenAccess W884996454 @default.
• W884996454 hasPrimaryLocation W8849964541 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W1485033186 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W157426966 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W1967484028 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W1978480543 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W1985435787 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W1998456549 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2001084142 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2007070420 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2034509640 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2044651255 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2057655122 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2089020611 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2117540098 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2134931011 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2143012535 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2153598123 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2163164235 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W2566161898 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W3155732825 @default.
• W884996454 hasRelatedWork W587026830 @default.
• W884996454 isParatext "false" @default.
• W884996454 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W884996454 magId "884996454" @default.
• W884996454 workType "article" @default.