FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W8850963> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W8850963 endingPage "5" @default.
• W8850963 startingPage "351" @default.
• W8850963 abstract "To compare the effectiveness of rinsing with an essential oil-containing antimicrobial mouthrinse with that of dental floss in reducing interproximal gingivitis and plaque in an unsupervised 6-month clinical trial designed in accordance with ADA Acceptance Program Guidelines.319 qualifying subjects, aged 18-63, were randomized into one of three groups: essential oil mouthrinse (Listerine Antiseptic); dental floss (Reach Dental Floss); or a negative control rinse. At baseline, subjects received a complete oral soft tissue examination and scoring of the Modified Gingival Index (MGI), modified Quigley-Hein Plaque Index (PI), and bleeding index (BI). Following a complete dental prophylaxis and receiving flossing or rinsing instructions, subjects started on their respective regimen. They continued on their assigned regimen unsupervised at home, in addition to toothbrushing, and were reexamined at 3 and 6 months. The treatment groups were compared with respect to baseline demographic and clinical variables. The primary efficacy variables were mean interproximal MGI and PI at 6 months. Intergroup differences at 3 and 6 months were tested using a one-way analysis of covariance model with treatment as a factor and the respective baseline value as the covariate. In addition, the essential oil mouthrinse was compared to floss for interproximal gingivitis reduction using at least as good as statistical criteria.301 subjects were considered evaluable. There were no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups at baseline, with the exception of the essential oil mouthrinse group having significantly fewer AfroAmerican subjects than the other two groups. For the interproximal MGI, the essential oil mouthrinse and flossing were both significantly more effective than the negative control (P < 0.001) at 3 and 6 months. The essential oil mouthrinse was shown to be at least as good as dental floss for the control of interproximal gingivitis. For the interproximal PI, the essential oil mouthrinse was significantly more effective than the negative control at 3 and 6 months (P < 0.001) while flossing was significantly more effective than the negative control at 3 months (P < 0.05) but not at 6 months. The essential oil mouthrinse was significantly more effective than floss (P < 0.001) at both these time periods." @default.
• W8850963 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W8850963 creator A5001697375 @default.
• W8850963 creator A5006313987 @default.
• W8850963 creator A5015249646 @default.
• W8850963 creator A5031681026 @default.
• W8850963 creator A5066791192 @default.
• W8850963 creator A5080109417 @default.
• W8850963 date "2002-12-01" @default.
• W8850963 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W8850963 title "Comparative effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse and dental floss in controlling interproximal gingivitis and plaque." @default.
• W8850963 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12691269" @default.
• W8850963 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W8850963 type Work @default.
• W8850963 sameAs 8850963 @default.
• W8850963 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632012 @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632013 @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632016 @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632017 @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632018 @default.
• W8850963 countsByYear W88509632019 @default.
• W8850963 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5001697375 @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5006313987 @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5015249646 @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5031681026 @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5066791192 @default.
• W8850963 hasAuthorship W8850963A5080109417 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C2780287645 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C2780791200 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C2781460226 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W8850963 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C142724271 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C199343813 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C2780287645 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C2780791200 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C2781460226 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C29694066 @default.
• W8850963 hasConceptScore W8850963C71924100 @default.
• W8850963 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W8850963 hasLocation W88509631 @default.
• W8850963 hasOpenAccess W8850963 @default.
• W8850963 hasPrimaryLocation W88509631 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W135937561 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2007148743 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2114966479 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2230481029 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2426070123 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2979507897 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W2997337359 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W3089258611 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W87651825 @default.
• W8850963 hasRelatedWork W8850963 @default.
• W8850963 hasVolume "15" @default.
• W8850963 isParatext "false" @default.
• W8850963 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W8850963 magId "8850963" @default.
• W8850963 workType "article" @default.