FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W89017013> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W89017013 endingPage "189" @default.
• W89017013 startingPage "178" @default.
• W89017013 abstract "Two experiments were performed to evaluate the effects of feeder design (conventional dry feeder vs. wet-dry feeder) and adjustment on growing-finishing pig performance. In both experiments, all pigs (PIC 337 x 1050) were fed the same corn-soybean meal diets with 15% dried distillers grains with solubles (DDGS). In Exp. 1, 1,296 pigs (initially 43 lb) were used in a 69-d study. From d 0 to 27, 3 feeder settings were evaluated for each feeder type. Numbered settings (located in each feeder) were 6, 8, and 10 for the conventional dry feeder and 6, 10, and 14 for the wet-dry feeder. An increased setting number corresponded to a greater opening. From d 27 to 69, all feeders were adjusted to an opening of approximately 1 in. (conventional dry feeder setting 8; wet-dry feeder setting 14). From d 0 to 27, pigs using a wet-dry feeder had lower (P < 0.02) ADFI and better F/G than pigs using a conventional dry feeder. Increasing the feeder setting improved (linear, P < 0.01) ADG, ADFI, and d-27 BW of pigs using a wet-dry feeder and increased (linear, P < 0.01) ADFI of pigs using a conventional dry feeder. From d 27 to 69, ADG and ADFI of pigs using a wet-dry feeder were greater (P < 0.01) than those of pigs using a conventional dry feeder, and increasing the feeder setting from d 0 to 27 resulted in greater (linear, P < 0.01) ADFI and poorer F/G for pigs using a wet-dry feeder. Overall (d 0 to 69), pigs using a wet-dry feeder had greater (P < 0.05) ADG, ADFI, final BW, and better F/G than pigs that used a conventional dry feeder. Increasing the feeder setting of a wet-dry feeder from d 0 to 27 resulted in greater (linear, P < 0.01) ADG and ADFI, poorer (linear, P < 0.03) F/G, and heavier (linear, P < 0.01) final BW. Feeder setting of a conventional dry feeder from d 0 to 27 did not affect overall performance. In Exp. 2, 1,248 pigs (initially 73 lb) were used in a 93-d study. Three feeder settings were evaluated throughout the study for each feeder type (conventional dry feeder set at 6, 8, and 10; wet-dry feeder set at 10, 14, and 18). Overall, pigs using a wet-dry feeder had greater (P < 0.05) ADG, ADFI, final BW, HCW, backfat depth, and feed cost but reduced (P < 0.04) fat-free lean index (FFLI) compared with pigs using a conventional dry feeder. Increasing the feeder setting of a wet-dry feeder resulted in greater (linear, P < 0.05) ADG, ADFI, final BW, HCW, backfat depth, and feed cost. When HCW was used as a covariate, FFLI of pigs using a wet-dry feeder decreased (linear, P < 0.02) with increased feeder opening. Increasing the feeder setting of a conventional dry feeder had no effect on growth performance and carcass characteristics. In conclusion, the growth rate of pigs improved with a wet-dry feeder compared with a conventional dry feeder; however, the growth of pigs using a wet-dry feeder was more sensitive to differences in feeder adjustment.; Swine Day, Manhattan, KS, November 18, 2010" @default.
• W89017013 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W89017013 creator A5025613109 @default.
• W89017013 creator A5026833964 @default.
• W89017013 creator A5031406943 @default.
• W89017013 creator A5044849120 @default.
• W89017013 creator A5063945728 @default.
• W89017013 creator A5074234100 @default.
• W89017013 date "2010-01-01" @default.
• W89017013 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W89017013 title "Effects of feeder design and feeder adjustment on the growth performance of growing- finishing pigs" @default.
• W89017013 doi "https://doi.org/10.4148/2378-5977.3423" @default.
• W89017013 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W89017013 type Work @default.
• W89017013 sameAs 89017013 @default.
• W89017013 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W89017013 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5025613109 @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5026833964 @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5031406943 @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5044849120 @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5063945728 @default.
• W89017013 hasAuthorship W89017013A5074234100 @default.
• W89017013 hasBestOaLocation W890170131 @default.
• W89017013 hasConcept C140793950 @default.
• W89017013 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W89017013 hasConcept C2779609043 @default.
• W89017013 hasConcept C2780138947 @default.
• W89017013 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W89017013 hasConceptScore W89017013C140793950 @default.
• W89017013 hasConceptScore W89017013C185592680 @default.
• W89017013 hasConceptScore W89017013C2779609043 @default.
• W89017013 hasConceptScore W89017013C2780138947 @default.
• W89017013 hasConceptScore W89017013C86803240 @default.
• W89017013 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W89017013 hasLocation W890170131 @default.
• W89017013 hasLocation W890170132 @default.
• W89017013 hasOpenAccess W89017013 @default.
• W89017013 hasPrimaryLocation W890170131 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W1531601525 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2319480705 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2384464875 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2606230654 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2607424097 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2948807893 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W4387497383 @default.
• W89017013 hasRelatedWork W2778153218 @default.
• W89017013 isParatext "false" @default.
• W89017013 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W89017013 magId "89017013" @default.
• W89017013 workType "article" @default.