FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W89305171> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W89305171 endingPage "35" @default.
• W89305171 startingPage "17" @default.
• W89305171 abstract "In this qualitative study, the authors examine the advisory program of a Horizon Schools to Watch middle grades school. Horizon Schools to Watch is the Illinois affiliate of the National Forum to Accelerate Middle School Reform national Schools to Watch (STW) program, meaning with the STW designation have made significant inroads in implementing exemplary middle school practice. This advisory program is unique in that girls and boys are separated by gender during the advisory time. Using focus group interviews of the middle grades students and their teaching teams for data gathering purposes, the authors explore issues related to the impact that gender separation has on establishing trust, openness and confidentiality within the advisory program. The findings suggest that gender separation appears to provide benefits in the eyes of the students and teachers, making the advisory program a key component in helping to provide an effective middle school environment.INTRODUCTIONAdvisory programs have a long history of being connected with for young adolescents. According to Galassi, Gulludge, and Cox (1998), advisory programs were conceptually present as far back as the 1890s as it was noted as a feature of junior high schools (p. 5). As time passed, advisory programs appeared to be connected to the notion of guidance, which was one of the classic functions of the junior high in the 1940s (Gruhn & Douglass, 1947; Vars, 1998). Major documents of the middle school movement have identified advisory programs as one of the distinguishing components of middle school philosophy and practice (Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, 1989; Jackson & Davis, 2000; National Middle School Association, 2003). Advisory programs have been defined as classes or meetings that take place on a regular basis, in which the students are placed in groups that are usually smaller (10-15) than most class rosters and where one adult takes on the role of student advocate (Andrews & Stem, 1992; Anfara, 2006; Dale, 1995). Advisory groups are characterized as being safe, open, and trusting places where adolescents can develop relationships with caring adults while learning about themselves and the impact they have on others (Dale, 1995; MacLaury, 1995; Shulkind & Foote, 2009).Even though most middle school advocates support the establishment of advisory programs, they have historically been regarded as difficult to implement (Putbrese, 1989). Reasons that make institutionalizing advisory programs a challenge center around issues related to teacher attitudes and preparation, structural difficulties such as scheduling and planning time, a lack of administrative support, the difficulty in solidifying curricula, and parental opposition (Wilson, 1998). While these reasons are significant, that have done advisory well have found both affective and academic benefits for their students (George & Oldaker, 1985; Putbrese, 1989).Advisory programs have many names and can be organized in multiple ways, making them appear quite different from school to school. However, the literature reflects a number of consistent goals for advisory programs and the reality does indeed appear to be that they serve a variety of purposes. Galassi et al. (1998) provide a typology of advisory emphases (p. 19) that identifies six different needs that advisory can meet:* Advocacy-designed to meet affective needs with a goal of establishing adult-student relationships;* Community-also designed to meet affective needs and aid in developing a group identity;* Skills-designed to meet both affective and cognitive needs with a goal of providing developmental guidance;* Invigoration-designed to meet affective needs by providing time for students to relax and recharge;* Academic-designed to address cognitive needs by addressing issues related to academic performance;* Administrative-designed to address house-keeping aspects of (Galassi et al. …" @default.
• W89305171 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W89305171 creator A5063688416 @default.
• W89305171 creator A5065984909 @default.
• W89305171 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W89305171 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W89305171 title "An Examination of a Gender-Separate Advisory Program." @default.
• W89305171 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W89305171 type Work @default.
• W89305171 sameAs 89305171 @default.
• W89305171 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W89305171 countsByYear W893051712015 @default.
• W89305171 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W89305171 hasAuthorship W89305171A5063688416 @default.
• W89305171 hasAuthorship W89305171A5065984909 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C2780876879 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C3017489713 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C3116431 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C542102704 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C56995899 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W89305171 hasConcept C84976871 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C144024400 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C15744967 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C17744445 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C19165224 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C19417346 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C2780876879 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C3017489713 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C3116431 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C509550671 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C542102704 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C56995899 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C71924100 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C77805123 @default.
• W89305171 hasConceptScore W89305171C84976871 @default.
• W89305171 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W89305171 hasLocation W893051711 @default.
• W89305171 hasOpenAccess W89305171 @default.
• W89305171 hasPrimaryLocation W893051711 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1165534 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1487489255 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1513473930 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1518278183 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W152873581 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1535082546 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W153647916 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W1571548832 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W2143566480 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W2170462716 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W219440181 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W25189769 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W256189570 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W2564292465 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W286035631 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W292435640 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W2925050508 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W35611067 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W51960321 @default.
• W89305171 hasRelatedWork W63969097 @default.
• W89305171 hasVolume "7" @default.
• W89305171 isParatext "false" @default.
• W89305171 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W89305171 magId "89305171" @default.
• W89305171 workType "article" @default.