FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W89648482> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W89648482 abstract "This bachelor thesis‘ research plans to answer the question: Which policy instruments of the EU lead to compliance with the EU‘s conditions of the EU membership candidate states? This will happen with regard to the different policy areas in which the EU wants to see compliance from the EU membership candidate states from Romania and Bulgaria in the area of the fight against corruption. Sub-questions to answer this research question are: What is political conditionality and what characteristics does it have? How does it work and under which circumstances and in which policy areas does it lead to compliance. All these questions are crucial for the success of future enlargements of the European Union. This research will with the questions it seeks to answer try to contribute to making conditionality and rule transfer from the EU to the candidate states more effective. This knowledge would help the EU in preparing the candidate states for membership and help the candidate states to comply with the EU‘s conditions. With the proposed research the aim is to clarify the nature and workings of EU conditionality make clear what factors have an influence on the effectiveness of it.In order to answer my research questions I will make use of a comparative case study in which it will be made clear how the different factors that are said to influence compliance - such as positive and negative conditionality, and the safeguard clauses have an on impact conditionality, and ultimately compliance of the candidate states.In my research in each case dealt with the dependent variable is going to be compliance and the kind of conditionality or rather the factor influencing compliance is the independent variable.In the countries of Romania and Bulgaria the workings of conditionality and hence brought about compliance or non-compliance with EU rules in the time before and after accession to the European Union will be analyzed and compared.Moreover in order to measure the level of compliance with the EU‘s rules concerning the fight against corruption in Romania and Bulgaria I will analyze the regular reports of 2001 and 2002(pre-accession phase) for both countries as well as the verification reports from 2007 and 2008 (post-accession phase). This should help in determining if compliance changed before and after accession to the European Union.Hence the main focus of this study will lie on examining the different policy instruments of conditionality, especially the safeguard clauses and on comparing compliance over time." @default.
• W89648482 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W89648482 creator A5003473358 @default.
• W89648482 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W89648482 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W89648482 title "EU political conditionality and compliance in the accession process of the European Union" @default.
• W89648482 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W89648482 type Work @default.
• W89648482 sameAs 89648482 @default.
• W89648482 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W89648482 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W89648482 hasAuthorship W89648482A5003473358 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C2777626052 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C2778221078 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C2781205572 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C2781460075 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C2910001868 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W89648482 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C144133560 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C155202549 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C15744967 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C17744445 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C199539241 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C2777626052 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C2778221078 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C2781205572 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C2781460075 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C2910001868 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C39549134 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C77805123 @default.
• W89648482 hasConceptScore W89648482C94625758 @default.
• W89648482 hasLocation W896484821 @default.
• W89648482 hasOpenAccess W89648482 @default.
• W89648482 hasPrimaryLocation W896484821 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W128373027 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1498232369 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1546850990 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1565045768 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1578297708 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1696991342 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W1910880339 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2052258587 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2121236466 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2163441618 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2165621152 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2166231944 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2171806540 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2759979664 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W2832792592 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W3123286282 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W3123749668 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W3183332634 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W46419422 @default.
• W89648482 hasRelatedWork W72720645 @default.
• W89648482 isParatext "false" @default.
• W89648482 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W89648482 magId "89648482" @default.
• W89648482 workType "dissertation" @default.