FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W91453006> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W91453006 endingPage "843" @default.
• W91453006 startingPage "838" @default.
• W91453006 abstract "Abstract The aim of this study is to examine the questionnaires used to evaluate teaching performance in higher education institutes and called 'Instructor and Course Evaluation Questionnaires (ICEQ**]' in terms of guestionnaire oreparation technigues and components of curriculum. Obtaining at least one ICEQ belonging to any state anc orivate universities in Turkey is the universe of the study. The sample of the study is 35 ICEQs from 32 universities. In this study, qualitative research methods are used and one of the data collection methods, document analysis method is applied and the documents/data are decoded by Content Analysis Method. The items of the questionnaires are analyzed in terms of curriculum components and guestionnaire preparing technigues. The findings of the study indicate that the items included in the guestionnaire are related mostly to the teachmg-.earnmg processes component of a curriculum. 52 % of all the guestionnaires items are determined as relatec to benefits obtained from the courses by students and it is found out that 21 % of the items are not appropriate for the criteria of preparing guestionnaires. That the analyzed ICEQs are prepared in accordance with curriculum and guestionnaire preparing technigues is vital because it contributes to validity and reliability of guestionnaires A qualified evaluation can be reached via findings obtained from reliable and valid data collection tools. It is a necessity to collect data through reliable and valid tools for summative and formative evaluations conducted for nstructors and courses in higher education institutions Key Words Higher Education, Instructor Evaluation Questionnaires, Teaching Performance, Teaching Quality. One of important signs of quality university is the quality level of instructor and his/her course. The quality of instructor is the leading one among the factors affecting directly the quality of education and so evaluation of nstructor performance is considered as the assurance of quality (Acan & Saydan, 2009, p. 227; Karamul-laoglu, 2000, p. 34). Due to the fact that there has been a strong demand for higher education, universities in Turkey have no fear of not being able to find students to be enrolled to their programs. Because of this fact, a serious competition can not be seen among state universities of Turkey. These uni-versities only compete for talented, academically high performing students (Turker, 2003). This result was valid for seven years ago when it was stated at that time, however by 2009-2010 academical year, some of the 103 state andd 53 private, in sum, total of 156 universities (Yuksekogretim Kurulu [YOK], 2010) in Turkey, are now facing problem of not being able to find enough students enrolled in their programs (Olcme, Secme ve Yerlestirme Merkezi [OSYM], 2010; Ozmen, 2010). The idea of universities given by Malche (1932) is stil very important as it was in the past for our moral future and our society's future. However, question of what has been done for improving these important institutions? has to be asked. To answer this question adequately, universities need to have an effective evaluation system. Gocmen (2004) stated that, nowadays, education related improvement concept contains both quantitative and qualitative improvement at the same time. Without evaluation, it is hard to deal with quality related problems. Moreover, as Theall and Franklin (2000) indicate, evaluation should not be regarded as a punitive process, on the contrary it is emphasized that evaluation should contribute to development. It is known that feedback from students and other sources have important functions and usages during evaluating and improving curricula of higher education institutions. As a result of this fact, European and American universities give great importance to the feedback based on evaluation made by students (Moore & Kuol, 2005). In Turkish literature, researches on ICEQs are very limi-ted. …" @default.
• W91453006 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W91453006 creator A5023422317 @default.
• W91453006 creator A5080391540 @default.
• W91453006 date "2012-04-01" @default.
• W91453006 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W91453006 title "Analysis of Questionnaires Applied in the Evaluation Process of Academicians in Higher Education Institutes." @default.
• W91453006 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W91453006 type Work @default.
• W91453006 sameAs 91453006 @default.
• W91453006 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W91453006 countsByYear W914530062013 @default.
• W91453006 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W91453006 hasAuthorship W91453006A5023422317 @default.
• W91453006 hasAuthorship W91453006A5080391540 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C145420912 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C152747807 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C42525527 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C43214815 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C47177190 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W91453006 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C121332964 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C133462117 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C144024400 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C145420912 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C152747807 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C15744967 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C163258240 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C19417346 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C36289849 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C42525527 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C43214815 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C47177190 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C509550671 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C62520636 @default.
• W91453006 hasConceptScore W91453006C71924100 @default.
• W91453006 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W91453006 hasLocation W914530061 @default.
• W91453006 hasOpenAccess W91453006 @default.
• W91453006 hasPrimaryLocation W914530061 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W144484405 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W1493303336 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W1555693863 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W1976674498 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2049855861 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2086147527 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2108148950 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2112084959 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2184006986 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2462297751 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2464161935 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W254727861 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2694192897 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W299685856 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W3036732630 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W315069578 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W37824436 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W1940132355 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2179513235 @default.
• W91453006 hasRelatedWork W2518391599 @default.
• W91453006 hasVolume "12" @default.
• W91453006 isParatext "false" @default.
• W91453006 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W91453006 magId "91453006" @default.
• W91453006 workType "article" @default.