Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W91945841> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 65 of
65
with 100 items per page.
- W91945841 abstract "The text of the U.S. Constitution clearly distinguishes religion from non-religion by providing that while Congress may pass laws concerning many subjects and prohibiting many things, it may not make laws respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting religious exercise. As the distinctiveness of religion is clear from the text, the Court has had no problem concluding that religion, as a subject matter, and religious believers, as a class of persons, are constitutionally distinct. Though not apparent from the text, it is equally clear, and equally settled, that the Religion Clauses tug the government in opposite directions. Noting this tension, the Court has tread the line between the clauses carefully, holding that if the government opposes the establishment of religion too vigorously it will burden religious exercise, and if the government seeks to accommodate religious exercise too liberally, it will establish religion. However, while these propositions - that religion is distinct and that there is tension between the Religion Clauses - are clear and settled, the Court has struggled mightily to reconcile them. That is, the Court has not been able to answer the following question: how differently may the government treat religion from non-religion under one clause without violating the other? This article attempts to answer that question. My answer is inspired and informed by Locke v. Davey, 540 US 712 (2004), a case in which the Court held that at least in certain contexts the Free Exercise Clause permits the government to exclude an individual from a funding program on the basis of religion. In answering this question, I hope to accomplish three goals: (1) to defend the holding and reasoning in Davey; (2) to assuage the concerns of Davey's critics; and (3) to develop a paradigm that grants states discretion over how they partner with religious organizations but still limits states in a way that is consistent with the guarantees in the Religion Clauses. Given the extensive criticism of the Davey opinion, and the normative and practical significance of the question addressed in this article, this analysis is particularly timely and important." @default.
- W91945841 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W91945841 creator A5081266489 @default.
- W91945841 date "2007-04-04" @default.
- W91945841 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W91945841 title "Finding a Ceiling in a Circular Room: Locke v. Davey, Religious Neutrality, and Federalism" @default.
- W91945841 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W91945841 type Work @default.
- W91945841 sameAs 91945841 @default.
- W91945841 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W91945841 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
- W91945841 hasAuthorship W91945841A5081266489 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C104636517 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2778323131 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2779581858 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C2994536602 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C533735693 @default.
- W91945841 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C104636517 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C138885662 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C144024400 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C17744445 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C199539241 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2776154427 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2778137410 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2778272461 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2778323131 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2779581858 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C2994536602 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C41895202 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C533735693 @default.
- W91945841 hasConceptScore W91945841C94625758 @default.
- W91945841 hasOpenAccess W91945841 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W123776885 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W1598035240 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W1952715105 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2264621186 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2279161233 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2284652353 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2288333585 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2327871803 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2337529531 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2494060584 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W2899658956 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3041426099 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W309539519 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3122307738 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3124147254 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3124685006 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3124848897 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W3174579194 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W615709356 @default.
- W91945841 hasRelatedWork W88973461 @default.
- W91945841 isParatext "false" @default.
- W91945841 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W91945841 magId "91945841" @default.
- W91945841 workType "article" @default.