FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W94014936> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W94014936 endingPage "500" @default.
• W94014936 startingPage "495" @default.
• W94014936 abstract "Background: A patient's ability to control an intermittent exotropic deviation is usually assessed by subjective means such as observation of control in the office, questioning the patient and/or family about control at home, and reports of monocular eye closure in bright light. An objective method of assessing control has not been developed. Purpose: The purposes of this study are to determine if distance stereoacuity was different in patients with intermittent exotropia than in normal subjects and to determine if distance stereoacuity could be used as a objective means of assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Methods: The authors evaluated near and distance stereoacuity in 44 patients with intermittent exotropia and 50 normal subjects. Patients with intermittent exotropia also were assessed for office control, home control, and monocular eye closure in bright light. Additionally, six patients who underwent successful surgery were reevaluated postoperatively. Conclusion: Normal subjects and patients with intermittent exotropia had good near stereoacuity. Patients with intermittent exotropia demonstrated significantly worse distance stereoacuity than the population of normal subjects (P < 0.001). Five of six patients with poor distance stereoacuity preoperatively had dramatic improvement in distance stereoacuity postoperatively. Diminished distance stereoacuity seems to be an objective measure of poor control of the exotropic deviation. This test may provide important objective criteria for deciding when to perform surgery in patients with intermittent exotropia. Background: A patient's ability to control an intermittent exotropic deviation is usually assessed by subjective means such as observation of control in the office, questioning the patient and/or family about control at home, and reports of monocular eye closure in bright light. An objective method of assessing control has not been developed. Purpose: The purposes of this study are to determine if distance stereoacuity was different in patients with intermittent exotropia than in normal subjects and to determine if distance stereoacuity could be used as a objective means of assessing control in intermittent exotropia. Methods: The authors evaluated near and distance stereoacuity in 44 patients with intermittent exotropia and 50 normal subjects. Patients with intermittent exotropia also were assessed for office control, home control, and monocular eye closure in bright light. Additionally, six patients who underwent successful surgery were reevaluated postoperatively. Conclusion: Normal subjects and patients with intermittent exotropia had good near stereoacuity. Patients with intermittent exotropia demonstrated significantly worse distance stereoacuity than the population of normal subjects (P < 0.001). Five of six patients with poor distance stereoacuity preoperatively had dramatic improvement in distance stereoacuity postoperatively. Diminished distance stereoacuity seems to be an objective measure of poor control of the exotropic deviation. This test may provide important objective criteria for deciding when to perform surgery in patients with intermittent exotropia." @default.
• W94014936 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W94014936 creator A5021985792 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5026079691 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5035272100 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5041694172 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5079153137 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5081989578 @default.
• W94014936 creator A5084007595 @default.
• W94014936 date "1993-04-01" @default.
• W94014936 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W94014936 title "Distance Stereoacuity" @default.
• W94014936 cites W1996693906 @default.
• W94014936 cites W2071559443 @default.
• W94014936 cites W2120671411 @default.
• W94014936 cites W2151539279 @default.
• W94014936 cites W2224062678 @default.
• W94014936 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(93)31616-7" @default.
• W94014936 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8479706" @default.
• W94014936 hasPublicationYear "1993" @default.
• W94014936 type Work @default.
• W94014936 sameAs 94014936 @default.
• W94014936 citedByCount "132" @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362012 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362013 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362014 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362015 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362016 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362017 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362018 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362019 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362020 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362021 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362022 @default.
• W94014936 countsByYear W940149362023 @default.
• W94014936 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5021985792 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5026079691 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5035272100 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5041694172 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5079153137 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5081989578 @default.
• W94014936 hasAuthorship W94014936A5084007595 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C119767625 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C168260308 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C2776864138 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C2778207058 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C2778257484 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C2908550172 @default.
• W94014936 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C118487528 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C119767625 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C141071460 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C168260308 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C2776864138 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C2778207058 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C2778257484 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C2908550172 @default.
• W94014936 hasConceptScore W94014936C71924100 @default.
• W94014936 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W94014936 hasLocation W940149361 @default.
• W94014936 hasLocation W940149362 @default.
• W94014936 hasOpenAccess W94014936 @default.
• W94014936 hasPrimaryLocation W940149361 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W1184753824 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W1622149532 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W2006286737 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W2072798312 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W2175718094 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W2313597279 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W3031749664 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W3127308914 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W4296898497 @default.
• W94014936 hasRelatedWork W4308729344 @default.
• W94014936 hasVolume "100" @default.
• W94014936 isParatext "false" @default.
• W94014936 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W94014936 magId "94014936" @default.
• W94014936 workType "article" @default.