Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W947524546> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W947524546 endingPage "246" @default.
- W947524546 startingPage "229" @default.
- W947524546 abstract "“The Age of Veneer”: Charles Dickens and the antinomies of Victorian consumer culture Peter Gurney (bio) The bicentenary of the birth of Charles Dickens in 2012 was celebrated in myriad ways across the English-speaking world and beyond. Building on the long-standing tradition of heritage appropriations of his work, the “Dickens industry” made full use of the commercial opportunities: in Britain, a major new biography was serialised on Radio 4, while reworkings of Dickens’s novels were an almost omnipresent feature on television (John 240–89). A dominant motif of this outpouring was Dickens’s “humanitarianism,” especially his sympathy for the poor and his injunctions to the rich on the duty of Christian charity. Surprisingly, given the ongoing economic crisis, Dickens’s attitude towards material greed went largely unremarked despite the fact that Our Mutual Friend, his last completed novel published in 1865, unreservedly damned the rich for their conspicuous consumption practices. His critique of the Veneerings and their circle and, by extension, the trajectory of British society in the “age of capital,” is all the more remarkable when we remember that Dickens was far from being a radical himself; he had embraced free trade in the mid 1840s and although he had conflicting feelings about capitalist modernity, Dickens had little time for attempts by either working-class Chartists or paternalistic Tories to regulate industrial “progress” (Slater). Precisely such contradictions make Dickens so interesting. Although he experienced the commodity culture on display at the Great Exhibition as a kind of drowning,1 Dickens also revelled in the excesses of Victorian consumerism. Dressed “in high satin stock and double breast pin, in glossy frock coat and velvet collar, in cut velvet waistcoat and glittering chain,” as a young man he presented himself as a dandy on the streets of London. On his first visit to America in 1842 one newspaper complained that Dickens’s [End Page 229] “whole appearance is foppish [...] and partakes of the flash order” (Ackroyd 349). Like many bourgeois paterfamilias, he did not have to be cajoled into accompanying his wife Catherine on shopping trips and derived real pleasure from beautifying domestic space. Dickens redecorated Tavistock House in lavish fashion after moving there towards the end of 1851, provoking George Eliot’s caustic question: “How can we sufficiently pity the needy unless we know fully the blessings of plenty?” (Ackroyd 648). George Orwell once noted in a perceptive essay how Dickens’s work was vitally concerned with understanding “a city of consumers,” and that he observed the social world primarily “from the consumer-angle [...] the kind of things he notices are inn-signs, brass door-knockers, painted jugs, the interiors of shops and private houses, clothes, faces and, above all, food” (115, 118). Moreover, Dickens’s writing was itself imbricated within a growing consumer culture. Many firms, including producers of branded goods such as Colman’s mustard and Pears’ soap, advertised in the inserts bound in with the serial parts of his novels. After he died tea dealers and others promoted their goods by giving away free copies of his works.2 Dickens understood the new consumerism from the inside. According to Dickens’s late work, modern consumerism depended on harnessing acquisitiveness more effectively than ever before. Again, he had no doubts about the benefits that had resulted from the spread of material things made possible by free trade capitalism; his own dislocated childhood experiences made it easier for him to see though puritan yearnings for the simple life. However, in his last decade especially, Dickens foregrounded the moral bankruptcy of a culture that revolved around the acquisition of goods. The financial scandals that rocked Victorian society in the 1860s shaped his increasingly bleak vision and scholarship has shed much light on this historical context. Fears of impending financial crisis were rife when Our Mutual Friend was being serialized and in 1866 Overend, Gurney & Co., a major wholesale discount bank, collapsed and brought down over 200 companies with it. Vicious attacks on the principle of limited liability and stock market speculation were commonly made by middle-class journalists and novelists.3 However, it would be misleading to make too much of this; the weak response of the..." @default.
- W947524546 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W947524546 creator A5014522365 @default.
- W947524546 date "2015-01-01" @default.
- W947524546 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
- W947524546 title "“The Age of Veneer”: Charles Dickens and the antinomies of Victorian consumer culture" @default.
- W947524546 cites W1486991636 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1493854420 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1509151767 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1538436959 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1544767573 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1550022383 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1556263870 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1573533426 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1573698395 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1579137925 @default.
- W947524546 cites W193340778 @default.
- W947524546 cites W1987036400 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2002156492 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2005249968 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2011449717 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2014455635 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2027260167 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2049904001 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2051142342 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2057020812 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2067887102 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2078479875 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2081626989 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2089633473 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2090018263 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2108819621 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2114791955 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2131019836 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2291054044 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2314899143 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2419234658 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2798349970 @default.
- W947524546 cites W3144816805 @default.
- W947524546 cites W359989854 @default.
- W947524546 cites W404633904 @default.
- W947524546 cites W560423398 @default.
- W947524546 cites W566436425 @default.
- W947524546 cites W579874589 @default.
- W947524546 cites W583784159 @default.
- W947524546 cites W588220212 @default.
- W947524546 cites W598883796 @default.
- W947524546 cites W602351917 @default.
- W947524546 cites W620562145 @default.
- W947524546 cites W623493403 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2014700271 @default.
- W947524546 cites W2489716555 @default.
- W947524546 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/dqt.2015.0025" @default.
- W947524546 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W947524546 type Work @default.
- W947524546 sameAs 947524546 @default.
- W947524546 citedByCount "20" @default.
- W947524546 countsByYear W9475245462017 @default.
- W947524546 countsByYear W9475245462019 @default.
- W947524546 countsByYear W9475245462022 @default.
- W947524546 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W947524546 hasAuthorship W947524546A5014522365 @default.
- W947524546 hasBestOaLocation W9475245462 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C2776787332 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C2778682666 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C2779115301 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C37531588 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W947524546 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C107038049 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C124952713 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C142362112 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C144024400 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C15744967 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C17744445 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C199539241 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C2776787332 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C2778682666 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C2779115301 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C37531588 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C52119013 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C77805123 @default.
- W947524546 hasConceptScore W947524546C95457728 @default.
- W947524546 hasIssue "3" @default.
- W947524546 hasLocation W9475245461 @default.
- W947524546 hasLocation W9475245462 @default.
- W947524546 hasOpenAccess W947524546 @default.
- W947524546 hasPrimaryLocation W9475245461 @default.
- W947524546 hasRelatedWork W1509547153 @default.
- W947524546 hasRelatedWork W164711866 @default.