FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W952267592> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W952267592 abstract "approved: Redacted for Privacy ,. Dr. Kathleen F. Heath Level of aspiration plays a part in achievement motivation which supports teaching/learning in motor performances. In the past, females reported poorer ability in performances, set lower levels of aspiration, and had lesser achievement motives than males (Crandall, 1969; Stein & Bailey, 1973; Sumner & Johnson, 1949). Some researchers found there were no gender differences in performance and aspiration levels (Kearney, 1984; Gill, Gross, Huddleston, & Shifflett, 1984). The purpose of this study was to determine if differential relationships existed in levels of aspiration and tennis backboard test performance for males and females, to determine the effects of aspiration setting on performance between two experimental groups, and to investigate the goal discrepancy scores between males and females in the aspiration group. A total of 28 males and 19 females were divided into two groups: aspiration setting and non-aspiration setting. They were classified as intermediate tennis players. The Hewitt Tennis Backboard Test (1965) was given to all males and females in both the experimental and control groups. Levels of aspiration were set only by the experimental group. These performance tests and aspiration settings were repeated four times. The control group was asked to perform only the performance test. All subjects were given knowledge of previous results. Five performance test scores and four level of aspiration scores from the experimental group, and five performance test scores from the control group were collected during a period of five weeks. All data were treated by analysis of variance. The results indicated that there were no significant gender differences on the tennis performance score, aspiration setting score, and goal discrepancy score in the aspiration setting group. There were, however, statistically gender differences on performance scores in the non-aspiration setting group. There were no significant differences in performance scores between the experimental and control groups. In contrast to the previous research studies, the above findings showed there were no gender differences on performance and level of aspiration, and no differences between aspiration setting and nonaspiration setting groups on performance scores. However, there were gender differences in performance in the non-aspiration setting group. GENDER DIFFERENCES AND LEVEL OF ASPIRATION AS FACTORS IN TENNIS SKILL PERFORMANCE OF COLLEGE STUDENTS" @default.
• W952267592 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W952267592 creator A5076281158 @default.
• W952267592 date "1987-03-16" @default.
• W952267592 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W952267592 title "Gender differences and level of aspiration as factors in tennis skill performance of college students" @default.
• W952267592 cites W106435787 @default.
• W952267592 cites W1521224697 @default.
• W952267592 cites W1522816386 @default.
• W952267592 cites W1973574647 @default.
• W952267592 cites W1983881143 @default.
• W952267592 cites W1984861545 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2014114421 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2018657871 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2021528856 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2071393271 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2076192758 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2081040812 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2084173026 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2088752125 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2175871891 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2255678820 @default.
• W952267592 cites W2501659236 @default.
• W952267592 cites W402877813 @default.
• W952267592 hasPublicationYear "1987" @default.
• W952267592 type Work @default.
• W952267592 sameAs 952267592 @default.
• W952267592 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W952267592 crossrefType "dissertation" @default.
• W952267592 hasAuthorship W952267592A5076281158 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C2777267654 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W952267592 hasConcept C99476002 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C126322002 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C151730666 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C15744967 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C2777267654 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C71924100 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C86803240 @default.
• W952267592 hasConceptScore W952267592C99476002 @default.
• W952267592 hasLocation W9522675921 @default.
• W952267592 hasOpenAccess W952267592 @default.
• W952267592 hasPrimaryLocation W9522675921 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W1545649965 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W1573486662 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W16013399 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W1655613825 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W1979060620 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2032778749 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2046915130 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2065027898 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2134604804 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2291198142 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W234638118 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2365240635 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2368852530 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2376691118 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W2619915956 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W270643874 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W277531217 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W303204101 @default.
• W952267592 hasRelatedWork W83072160 @default.
• W952267592 isParatext "false" @default.
• W952267592 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W952267592 magId "952267592" @default.
• W952267592 workType "dissertation" @default.