FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W96954501> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W96954501 endingPage "128" @default.
• W96954501 startingPage "124" @default.
• W96954501 abstract "Abstract In an era in which the federal government is going to spend an unprecedented 53.1 billion dollars on public education, the level of accountability and pressure has increased for both students and teachers (U.S. Department of Education, 2003). The College of Education at North Carolina State University is developing a more deliberate process by which program assessment will be undertaken and reported annually. The process is supported by the use of specific technologies to assist in the design, collection, management, and reporting of assessment data. This paper reports on how design principles and technology tools were employed to support emerging progress for continuous program improvement. Introduction North Carolina State University's College of Education is dedicated to continuous program improvement and has developed a more deliberate process by which program assessment will be designed, implemented, and evaluated. The process is supported by the University's assessment-based Undergraduate Program Review (UAPR). The reporting procedure will be supported by the use of specific technology for the collection, storage, and reporting of assessment practices, findings, and program changes occurring as a result of the findings. The assessment process was initially implemented using the nine undergraduate academic programs in teacher education in the fall of 2002 and were extended to graduate programs in the fall of 2003. The purpose of this paper is to document that deliberate process and how it relates to two specific questions: (1) How can a more deliberate process of program assessment design and implementation be initiated? (2) How can the use of specific technology impact the manner in which assessment is conducted in a college of education? Undergraduate Assessment-Based Program Review University Context North Carolina State University (NCSU) is a research-extensive land-grant university located in Raleigh, North Carolina. The university has a present day population of over 29,000 students and over 1,600 faculty members. It is home to 10 colleges and offers bachelor's degrees in 92 fields, masters degrees in 101 fields, and doctoral degrees in 58 fields (NCSU, 2003). All undergraduate programs at NCSU participate in the UAPR process. The UAPR process includes submission of an assessment plan and portfolio for each program. The process allows each program to determine objectives, outcomes, and measures appropriate for that program and promotes program improvement by asking a series of questions: (1) What are we trying to do and why are we doing it? (2) What do we expect the student to know or do as a result of our program? (3) How well are we doing it? (4) What evidence do we have to support our findings? (5) How do we use the information to improve? (6) Do the improvements we make work? Four specific outcomes for programs are a direct result of the UAPR process: (1) increased knowledge about the reality of program quality; (2) evidence-based decision making; (3) greater accountability to stakeholders; (4) evidence for meeting requirements of accrediting institutions (NCSU Provost, 2002). College Context The College of Education at NCSU is composed of four departments: Adult and Community College Education; Curriculum and Instruction; Educational Research and Leadership and Counselor Education; and Math, Science, and Technology Education (NCSU College of Education, 2003). The College has made a commitment to effective program assessment and to innovation in undergraduate teacher education and graduate programs. The College affirms this commitment in the following propositions: (1) Encourage dialogue on the content of assessment. (2) Recognize that assessment should be public. (3) Assess the cognitive and behavioral outcomes as well as personal and social dispositions. (4) Link assessment back to the conceptual framework. (5) Develop multiple and varied assessments. …" @default.
• W96954501 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W96954501 creator A5055569573 @default.
• W96954501 creator A5060073862 @default.
• W96954501 date "2004-03-22" @default.
• W96954501 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W96954501 title "Principles for More Deliberate Assessment" @default.
• W96954501 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W96954501 type Work @default.
• W96954501 sameAs 96954501 @default.
• W96954501 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W96954501 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W96954501 hasAuthorship W96954501A5055569573 @default.
• W96954501 hasAuthorship W96954501A5060073862 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C110354214 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C133462117 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C2776007630 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C36289849 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C39549134 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W96954501 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C110354214 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C111919701 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C127413603 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C133462117 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C138885662 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C144024400 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C15744967 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C17744445 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C199539241 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C2776007630 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C2778137410 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C36289849 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C39549134 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C41008148 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C41895202 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C509550671 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C71924100 @default.
• W96954501 hasConceptScore W96954501C98045186 @default.
• W96954501 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W96954501 hasLocation W969545011 @default.
• W96954501 hasOpenAccess W96954501 @default.
• W96954501 hasPrimaryLocation W969545011 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W1554201742 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W159230150 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W1975669202 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2120309148 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2125550545 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2126814990 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2159937133 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2188935619 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2227328148 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2268013129 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W230196346 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2396990350 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W240575161 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2527445224 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W335900207 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W344239992 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W48662566 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W52486721 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W2597459088 @default.
• W96954501 hasRelatedWork W3108227265 @default.
• W96954501 hasVolume "8" @default.
• W96954501 isParatext "false" @default.
• W96954501 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W96954501 magId "96954501" @default.
• W96954501 workType "article" @default.