FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W97164750> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W97164750 endingPage "733" @default.
• W97164750 startingPage "727" @default.
• W97164750 abstract "Much attention has been given to new of college students today. Indeed, some maintain that American family is doomed because of attitudes of young people today toward sex and family. How does sexual morality of college students today compare with sexual morality of college students over half a century ago? To answer this question a replication of 1940 study of sexual morality of college students by John Cuber and Betty Bell published in American Journal of Sociology was conducted between 2000 and 2005. Gender comparisons were made with respect to sexual morality involving pre-marital sex, extra-marital sex, and childlessness. INTRODUCTION Seldom, if at all, have issues of morality been so disturbing for members of American society. Leaders, both political and religious, are taking different positions on a variety of issues, ranging from war to homosexuality to abortion. At times, stance taken is related to dictionary terms of what is right and wrong. However, morality has many more dimensions that stretch between right and wrong. In many respects morality is a moving target, with people changing their position on various issues. BACKGROUND Gilligan (1982, 1990) decided to determine if gender perceptions were different with respect to morality. Based on interviews with 200 men and women, she reported that females are more apt to evaluate morality in terms of personal relationships. Females want to find out how a behavior affects others and are focused on personal loyalties and with harm that might come to loved ones. Males on other hand, generally are more reserved with abstract principles that define right or wrong. A behavior is in agreement or disagreement with a role of ethics, and personal relationships play a minor role. An investigation of Gilligan's conclusions (Wark and Krebs, 1996), found that both males and females use personal relationships and abstract principles when they make moral judgments. As a result, Gilligan no longer advocates her original stand (Brannan, 1999). However, issue is not settled, since some researchers have found differences in how males and females make moral judgments (White 1999; Jaffee and Hyde 2000). Schools develop children's conceptions of gender by teaching them that teachers expect differences from boys and girls. Martin (1998) found that teachers discourage girls from speaking loudly and put more restrictions on their movement than they do on boys. Moreover, teachers are generally more likely to physically restrain boys than girls. These actions socialize boys and girls that they are being perceived differently. While differences in moral judgments of females and males remain somewhat unsettled, research has indicated that females engage in less antisocial behavior. This gender difference in antisocial behavior has been shown using a variety of methods. Crime statistics from several countries have consistently demonstrated higher rates of arrest and conviction for males than females with respect to a variety of crimes (Heidensohn 1997). Besides criminal statistics, other methods have been used to study gender differences in antisocial behavior. Research employing self-report methodology has determined that males exhibit more nonviolent and violent antisocial behavior than females in several societies (Junger-Tas, Terlouw, and Klein 1994). Parent and teacher reports collected across numerous cultures have also supported males' greater involvement in antisocial conduct (e.g. Achenbach, Bird, et al. 1990). Epidemiological studies of mental disorders related to antisocial behavior have found higher rates of these disorders in males than females (e.g. Kessler et al. 1994). While a gender difference in antisocial behavior has been well documented, explanations for this difference have been elusive. Based on a review of literature, Rutter, Giller, and Hagell (1998) maintained that the topic of gender difference in antisocial behavior should be high on research agenda . …" @default.
• W97164750 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W97164750 creator A5036925875 @default.
• W97164750 date "2007-09-01" @default.
• W97164750 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W97164750 title "College Student Sexual Morality Revisited: A Consideration of Pre-Marital Sex, Extra-Marital Sex and Childlessness between 1940 and 2000-2005." @default.
• W97164750 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W97164750 type Work @default.
• W97164750 sameAs 97164750 @default.
• W97164750 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W97164750 countsByYear W971647502013 @default.
• W97164750 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W97164750 hasAuthorship W97164750A5036925875 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C107993555 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C11171543 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C200113983 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C2776001192 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C2777363581 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C2778750047 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C2993290233 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C4306678 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C76247681 @default.
• W97164750 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C107993555 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C11171543 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C144024400 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C15744967 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C17744445 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C199539241 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C200113983 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C2776001192 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C2777363581 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C2778750047 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C2993290233 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C4306678 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C76247681 @default.
• W97164750 hasConceptScore W97164750C77805123 @default.
• W97164750 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W97164750 hasLocation W971647501 @default.
• W97164750 hasOpenAccess W97164750 @default.
• W97164750 hasPrimaryLocation W971647501 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1535411006 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1567012567 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1698724080 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1899364255 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1978022221 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W1999986661 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2007993084 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2008649976 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2064569166 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2065428634 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2096329914 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2110961596 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2148345981 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2175568912 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2184460086 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2505342723 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2589852521 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W2978399229 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W3123998867 @default.
• W97164750 hasRelatedWork W3155230262 @default.
• W97164750 hasVolume "41" @default.
• W97164750 isParatext "false" @default.
• W97164750 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W97164750 magId "97164750" @default.
• W97164750 workType "article" @default.