Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W9837560> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W9837560 endingPage "264" @default.
- W9837560 startingPage "253" @default.
- W9837560 abstract "The main focus of this note is Phillips v South African National Parks Board (4035/07) [2010] ZAECGHC 27 (22 April 2010) SAFLII http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECGHC/2010/27.html (accessed 13-06-2012), which was a case dealing with the erection of a fence that encroached on the applicant's property. The note explores the current way that courts deal with encroachment disputes in light of the Phillips judgment. This judgment correctly confirms that courts assume the existence of a wide discretion to replace injunctive relief (or mandatory interdicts) with compensatory awards; it illustrates how the discretion will be exercised in order to reach a just and equitable outcome and lays open the possible constitutional implications that may be triggered if encroachments are not ordered to be removed.What is problematic in this case is that the court considered the possibility of ordering transfer of the land to the affected landowner. If a court exercises its discretion in favour of leaving the encroachment in place and additionally orders that the encroached-upon land be transferred to the encroacher, this court order sanctions an involuntary transfer of the affected property. The loss of property or property rights needs to comply with section 25 of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. The crucial concern in this case is whether the common law actually authorises such a court order that results in the deprivation. However, the possible constitutional problem that may have been created by an order for transfer of the affected land was avoided because the court ordered in terms of its discretion that the encroachment be removed. It should be noted, though, that the court's remarks concerning the transfer order were made purely on the basis of the balance of prejudice and not on any constitutional principle. To my mind, the possibility of constitutional infringement may very well have arisen if the balance of prejudice favoured the encroacher and therefore the issue needs to be considered." @default.
- W9837560 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W9837560 creator A5008104067 @default.
- W9837560 date "2012-01-01" @default.
- W9837560 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
- W9837560 title "The discretion of courts in encroachment disputes [Discussion of Phillips v South African National Parks Board (4035/07) [2010] ZAECGHC 27 (22 April 2010)]" @default.
- W9837560 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W9837560 type Work @default.
- W9837560 sameAs 9837560 @default.
- W9837560 citedByCount "1" @default.
- W9837560 countsByYear W98375602017 @default.
- W9837560 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W9837560 hasAuthorship W9837560A5008104067 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C109821171 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2776862595 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2777632292 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2778069335 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C2778645526 @default.
- W9837560 hasConcept C53858194 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C10138342 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C109821171 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C144024400 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C144133560 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C170706310 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C17744445 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C182306322 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C190253527 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C199539241 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2776154427 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2776862595 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2777632292 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2778069335 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2778272461 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C2778645526 @default.
- W9837560 hasConceptScore W9837560C53858194 @default.
- W9837560 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W9837560 hasLocation W98375601 @default.
- W9837560 hasOpenAccess W9837560 @default.
- W9837560 hasPrimaryLocation W98375601 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W1571338112 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W161679594 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W1834337376 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W2206593084 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W2272156029 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W2279087869 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W2321694446 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W254555521 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W3037791442 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W305095276 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W306134649 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W3124555417 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W3125213471 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W3208490731 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W32520644 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W341187161 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W1890540300 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W1963748105 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W208767325 @default.
- W9837560 hasRelatedWork W3121574575 @default.
- W9837560 hasVolume "23" @default.
- W9837560 isParatext "false" @default.
- W9837560 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W9837560 magId "9837560" @default.
- W9837560 workType "article" @default.