FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W988893036> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W988893036 endingPage "232" @default.
• W988893036 startingPage "198" @default.
• W988893036 abstract "The Uruguay Round agreements involved a substantial expansion in the commitments made by World Trade Organisation (WTO) members. To strengthen the incentives for nations to adhere to these new rules, the multilateral dispute settlement procedures were reformed. A member can now withdraw the concessions it has made to another member that has been found to have broken its multilateral commitments. Thus, it is the threat of bilateral sanctions against a nation's own exports that provides the nation with an incentive not to renege on its obligations at the WTO. I assess the strength of the incentives created by trade sanctions for the twenty largest exporters in the developing world and, for comparative purposes, Japan and the United States. For each of these 22 economies, I calculate the percentage of a nation's market access is effectively protected by the potential for WTO-sanctioned retaliation; taking into account the fact that each nation's trading partners vary considerably in the amount of bilateral trade that they could, in principle, sanction and the fact that the impact of sanctions varies markedly across different types of goods. The findings not only confirm some of the conjectures made in the existing literature, but also point to the importance of some hitherto unremarked upon factors. Most notably, the proportion of market access protected varies considerably across nations, and does not appear to be related to the level of development; which is germane to the discussion of prevailing asymmetries between industrial and developing economies in the WTO's Dispute Settlement Understanding. Another finding is that, as far as the twenty-two large trading nations considered here are concerned, one can identify a clear WTO enforcement of nations whose bilateral trade flows are sufficiently large that they have some clout over several importing nations. Interestingly, it looks like membership of this club does not extend to Africa (even to South Africa), South Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America. A related point is that the data points to a growing potential role for East Asian nations in the dispute settlement." @default.
• W988893036 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W988893036 creator A5050765674 @default.
• W988893036 date "2010-01-07" @default.
• W988893036 modified "2023-09-24" @default.
• W988893036 title "Sticking to the rules: quantifying the market access that is potentially protected by WTO-sanctioned trade retaliation" @default.
• W988893036 cites W1994510983 @default.
• W988893036 cites W2026217839 @default.
• W988893036 cites W2156203513 @default.
• W988893036 cites W3123057106 @default.
• W988893036 cites W3125621633 @default.
• W988893036 cites W3126143478 @default.
• W988893036 cites W591340202 @default.
• W988893036 doi "https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511674594.008" @default.
• W988893036 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W988893036 type Work @default.
• W988893036 sameAs 988893036 @default.
• W988893036 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W988893036 countsByYear W9888930362013 @default.
• W988893036 countsByYear W9888930362016 @default.
• W988893036 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.
• W988893036 hasAuthorship W988893036A5050765674 @default.
• W988893036 hasBestOaLocation W9888930362 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C155202549 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C18547055 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W988893036 hasConcept C2777481183 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C118518473 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C144133560 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C155202549 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C162324750 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C166957645 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C18547055 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C205649164 @default.
• W988893036 hasConceptScore W988893036C2777481183 @default.
• W988893036 hasLocation W9888930361 @default.
• W988893036 hasLocation W9888930362 @default.
• W988893036 hasOpenAccess W988893036 @default.
• W988893036 hasPrimaryLocation W9888930361 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W1526905699 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W1911325930 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2092220249 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2137490428 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2749941575 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2803877669 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2941188620 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W3125505443 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W4291194986 @default.
• W988893036 hasRelatedWork W2115997682 @default.
• W988893036 isParatext "false" @default.
• W988893036 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W988893036 magId "988893036" @default.
• W988893036 workType "book-chapter" @default.