FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W99117492> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W99117492 endingPage "63" @default.
• W99117492 startingPage "53" @default.
• W99117492 abstract "According to Dewey inquiry proceeds from uncertainty to integration and control. Even if Dewey pays attention to the incompleteness of nature, to the modification and revision of primary generalizations by more elaborated conceptions, to the necessity of introducing changes in the world in order to carry an experimental inquiry, to the possibility of re-determine the interdependent constituents in a “transaction”, he seems not to be aware of the instability that this process of revision implies: we do not know in advance whether a newly undertaken revision is a progress or a waste of time. If we accept this consequence of pragmatism, how can we be confident in the truth of our beliefs, if we know in advance that most of them are to be revised, and that even if our belief is by chance a really true one, it could be reasonable some day to pay attention to some counter-argument that would induce us to revise it. How can be maintained the practical force of an obligation, if all norms are to be revised someday, and if we never know whether our favorite norms are really not been revised? The stability that pragmatism seems to aim at could be obtained by studying the relation between two opposite revisions, where some properties of symmetry and fairness can be required and defined, in a “transactional” fashion that is reminiscent of Dewey. When these properties are not satisfied, it will be true forever that we are and will be entitled to require a revision of the situation. But then, the core of pragmatism is the revolt against what is unfair, a negative content. On the contrary, Dewey has always insisted upon the positive effect of negative situations, seeing failure as learning and negation as positive determination. Key-words: pragmatism, Dewey, inquiry, revision, ethics, democracy, transaction. Resumo: Segundo Dewey, a investigacao procede da incerteza a integracao e ao controle. Mesmo Dewey prestando atencao a incompletude da natureza, a modificacao e revisao das generalizacoes por concepcoes mais elaboradas, a necessidade de introduzir mudancas no mundo de forma que conduza a uma investigacao experimental, a possibilidade de re-determinar os constituintes interdependentes em uma “transacao”, ele parece nao estar consciente da instabilidade que esse processo de revisao implica: nos nao sabemos de antemao se uma nova revisao realizada e um progresso ou uma perda de tempo. Se aceitarmos essa consequencia do pragmatismo, como podemos estar confiantes na veracidade de nossas crencas, ja que sabemos de antemao que a maior parte delas devera ser revisada? E mesmo se nossa crenca for efetivamente verdadeira, poderia ser razoavel algum dia prestar atencao a algum contra-argumento que poderia induzir-nos a revisa-la. Como pode ser mantida a forca pratica de uma obrigacao, se todas as normas" @default.
• W99117492 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W99117492 creator A5014793652 @default.
• W99117492 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W99117492 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W99117492 title "The role of revision in Dewey's inquiry and ethics" @default.
• W99117492 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W99117492 type Work @default.
• W99117492 sameAs 99117492 @default.
• W99117492 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W99117492 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W99117492 hasAuthorship W99117492A5014793652 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C158573231 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C182306322 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C185874996 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C25343380 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C2778447849 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W99117492 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C10138342 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C111472728 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C138885662 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C144024400 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C158573231 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C162324750 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C17744445 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C182306322 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C185592680 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C185874996 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C199539241 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C25343380 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C2778447849 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C41008148 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C55493867 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C77088390 @default.
• W99117492 hasConceptScore W99117492C98184364 @default.
• W99117492 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W99117492 hasLocation W991174921 @default.
• W99117492 hasOpenAccess W99117492 @default.
• W99117492 hasPrimaryLocation W991174921 @default.
• W99117492 isParatext "false" @default.
• W99117492 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W99117492 magId "99117492" @default.
• W99117492 workType "article" @default.