FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W99242544> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W99242544 endingPage "82" @default.
• W99242544 startingPage "173" @default.
• W99242544 abstract "The purpose of this study is to compose between hand scaling with abd without the calculus solvent gel (sofscale) and ultrasonic instrumentation at clinical and SEM level. 30 patients belonging to the age group of 17-50 year were selected. Patients selected were subjected to three different scaling modalities namely hand scaling (control), hand scaling using sofscale (Experimental quadrant A) and ultrasonic scaling (Experimental quadrant B), in three different quadrants. Case report forms were used to document the tooth sensitivity, soft tissue pain after scaling, patient preference of instrumentation, ease of calculus removal, patient comfort, soft tissue irritation, time taken for scaling, Bleeding while scaling, pre and post operative sulcus bleeding index. In addition to the clinical criteria, the teeth treated were extracted and evaluated using the scanning electron microscope to show potential effects on cemntal surfaces. No difference in tooth sensitivity was appreciated between control and experimental quadrant A. There was a higher degree of tooth sensitivity when treated with ultrasonic. Patients in control group appreciated a higher degree of soft tissue pain. Hand scaling using softscale produced a lesser amount of pain and treatment with ultrasoincs was the least painful. Most of the patients preferred ultrasonic scaling (70%) Calculus removal was easier. Hand scaling using sofscale gel results in more patient comfort when compared to hand scaling alone. There was no significant difference in patient comfort between handscaling using sofscale and ultrasonic scaling. The percentage of reduction of sulcus bleeding index showed no difference between the 3 scaling modalities SEM evaluation revealed that there was no significant difference the 3 scaling modalities in relation to residual calculus, cleaning efficiency and damage to the root surface. This study concluded that treatment with sofscale gel appears to be safe and effective method for removal calculus as this did not damage cemental surfaces, nor did it cause any damage to soft tissue. Your tratar is your calcified hate. Not only the microflora in your oral cavity but also your muddled thoughts, your obstinate squinting backward, the way you regree when you mean to progress, in other words, the tendency of your diseased gums to form germ catching pockets, all that, the sum of dental picture and psyche, betrays you, it is stored up violence, full of murdero us designs Gunter Grass." @default.
• W99242544 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W99242544 creator A5014303653 @default.
• W99242544 creator A5022301096 @default.
• W99242544 creator A5090696454 @default.
• W99242544 date "2003-05-27" @default.
• W99242544 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W99242544 title "A clinical and SEM evaluation of the efficiency of sofscale gel and hand scaling and hand scaling alone." @default.
• W99242544 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12765098" @default.
• W99242544 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W99242544 type Work @default.
• W99242544 sameAs 99242544 @default.
• W99242544 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W99242544 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W99242544 hasAuthorship W99242544A5014303653 @default.
• W99242544 hasAuthorship W99242544A5022301096 @default.
• W99242544 hasAuthorship W99242544A5090696454 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C143753070 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C2780639617 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C81288441 @default.
• W99242544 hasConcept C99844830 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C126838900 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C141071460 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C143753070 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C199343813 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C2524010 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C2780639617 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C33923547 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C71924100 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C81288441 @default.
• W99242544 hasConceptScore W99242544C99844830 @default.
• W99242544 hasIssue "3-4" @default.
• W99242544 hasLocation W992425441 @default.
• W99242544 hasOpenAccess W99242544 @default.
• W99242544 hasPrimaryLocation W992425441 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2041766386 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2050605791 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2348850768 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2361030881 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2367825803 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2373416058 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2383615799 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W2460091289 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W4255701729 @default.
• W99242544 hasRelatedWork W4256079608 @default.
• W99242544 hasVolume "13" @default.
• W99242544 isParatext "false" @default.
• W99242544 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W99242544 magId "99242544" @default.
• W99242544 workType "article" @default.