FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W99385433> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W99385433 endingPage "550" @default.
• W99385433 startingPage "525" @default.
• W99385433 abstract "PreviousNext No AccessNear-Surface Geophysics17. Electrical Resistance Tomography—Theory and PracticeAuthors: William DailyAbelardo RamirezAndrew BinleyDouglas LaBrecqueD. L. AlumbaughG. A. NewmanK. AkiA. ChristofferssonE. S. HusebyeK. AkiP. RichardsD. L. AndersonA. M. DziewonskiD. C. BarberB. H. BrownI. L. FreestonA. BinleyA. RamirezW. DailyM. S. BeckB. S. HoyleM. A. MorrisR. C. WaterfallR. A. WilliamsA. BinleyS. Henry-PoulterB. ShawA. BinleyA. BinleyP. WinshipM. PokarJ. WestZ. BingS. A. GreenhalghB. H. BrownA. D. SeagarN. R. CarlsonC. M. MayerleK. ZongeJ. H. CoggonD. M. ConsidineN. B. ChristensenK. SorensenR. S. BellM. H. CramerT. DahlinW. DailyJ. LytleW. D. DailyW. LinT. BuscheckW. DailyE. OwenW. DailyA. RamirezD. LaBrecqueJ. NitaoW. DailyA. RamirezR. NewmarkV. GeorgeW. DailyA. RamirezK. ZongeC. deGroot-HedlinC. S. ConstableA. DeyH. F. MorrisonA. DeyH. F. MorrisonK. A. DinesR. J. LytleR. G. EllisD. W. OldenburgD. GisserD. IsaacsonJ. C. NewellD. B. GeselowitzJ. GobleD. IsaacsonM. R. HestenesG. W. HohmannG. N. HounsfieldS. S. HubbardD. D. JacksonG. V. KellerF. C. FrischknechtA. KemnaA. KemnaA. M. BinleyA. KemnaA. BinleyA. RamirezW. DailyD. J. LaBrecqueD. J. LaBrecqueS. H. WardS. H. WardD. J. LaBrecqueG. MorelliA. RamirezW. DailyP. LundegardD. J. LaBrecqueD. J. LaBrecqueX. YangD. L. LagerR. J. LytleV. LesurM. CuerA. StraubY. LiD. W. OldenburgW. LinM. H. LokeR. D. BarkerT. LowryM. B. AllenP. N. ShiveP. D. LundegardD. J. LaBrecqueR. J. LytleK. A. DinesD. J. MarshallT. R. MaddenG. MorelliD. J. LaBrecqueD. W. OldenburgY. LiD. W. OldenburgY. LiP. A. OlsenA. BinleyS. Henry-PoulterW. TychS. K. ParkG. P. VanA. RamirezA. RamirezW. DailyR. NewmarkA. RamirezA. RamirezW. DailyA. BinleyD. LaBrecqueA. RamirezW. DailyJ. RobertsJ. RobertsW. LinY. SasakiY. SasakiS. SchimaD. J. LaBrecqueP. D. LundegardC. SchlumbergerH. ShimaH. ShimaH. ShimaT. SakayamaG. ShoreL. SlaterA. BinleyD. BrownL. SlaterM. D. ZaidmanA. M. BinleyL. J. WestL. SlaterA. BinleyW. DailyR. JohnsonA. TarantolaW. M. TelfordL. P. GeldartR. E. SheriffD. A. KeysA. N. TikhonovV. Y. ArseninA. C. TrippG. W. HohmannC. M. SwiftG. C. Van VoorhisP. H. NelsonT. L. DrakeD. W. VascoA. Datta-GuptaJ. C. S. LongJ. R. WaitM. H. WaxmanE. C. ThomasM. H. WaxmanE. C. ThomasJ. G. WebsterA. WexlerB. FryM. R. NeumanD. WilderM. J. WiltX. YangD. J. LaBrecqueT. J. YorkeyJ. G. WebsterW. J. TompkinsT. J. YorkeyJ. G. WebsterW. J. TompkinsJ. ZhangR. L. MackieT. MaddenS. ZhaoM. J. YedlinB. ZhouS. A. GreenhalghWilliam DailyLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.Multi-phase Technologies, LLC, Sparks, NV 89436, U.S.Search for more papers by this author, Abelardo RamirezLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.Multi-phase Technologies, LLC, Sparks, NV 89436, U.S.Search for more papers by this author, Andrew BinleyLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.Multi-phase Technologies, LLC, Sparks, NV 89436, U.S.Search for more papers by this author, Douglas LaBrecqueLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550, U.S.Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, U.K.Multi-phase Technologies, LLC, Sparks, NV 89436, U.S.Search for more papers by this author, D. L. AlumbaughSearch for more papers by this author, G. A. NewmanSearch for more papers by this author, K. AkiSearch for more papers by this author, A. ChristofferssonSearch for more papers by this author, E. S. HusebyeSearch for more papers by this author, K. AkiSearch for more papers by this author, P. RichardsSearch for more papers by this author, D. L. AndersonSearch for more papers by this author, A. M. DziewonskiSearch for more papers by this author, D. C. BarberSearch for more papers by this author, B. H. BrownSearch for more papers by this author, I. L. FreestonSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, M. S. BeckSearch for more papers by this author, B. S. HoyleSearch for more papers by this author, M. A. MorrisSearch for more papers by this author, R. C. WaterfallSearch for more papers by this author, R. A. WilliamsSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, S. Henry-PoulterSearch for more papers by this author, B. ShawSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, P. WinshipSearch for more papers by this author, M. PokarSearch for more papers by this author, J. WestSearch for more papers by this author, Z. BingSearch for more papers by this author, S. A. GreenhalghSearch for more papers by this author, B. H. BrownSearch for more papers by this author, A. D. SeagarSearch for more papers by this author, N. R. CarlsonSearch for more papers by this author, C. M. MayerleSearch for more papers by this author, K. ZongeSearch for more papers by this author, J. H. CoggonSearch for more papers by this author, D. M. ConsidineSearch for more papers by this author, N. B. ChristensenSearch for more papers by this author, K. SorensenSearch for more papers by this author, R. S. BellSearch for more papers by this author, M. H. CramerSearch for more papers by this author, T. DahlinSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, J. LytleSearch for more papers by this author, W. D. DailySearch for more papers by this author, W. LinSearch for more papers by this author, T. BuscheckSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, E. OwenSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, D. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, J. NitaoSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, R. NewmarkSearch for more papers by this author, V. GeorgeSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, K. ZongeSearch for more papers by this author, C. deGroot-HedlinSearch for more papers by this author, C. S. ConstableSearch for more papers by this author, A. DeySearch for more papers by this author, H. F. MorrisonSearch for more papers by this author, A. DeySearch for more papers by this author, H. F. MorrisonSearch for more papers by this author, K. A. DinesSearch for more papers by this author, R. J. LytleSearch for more papers by this author, R. G. EllisSearch for more papers by this author, D. W. OldenburgSearch for more papers by this author, D. GisserSearch for more papers by this author, D. IsaacsonSearch for more papers by this author, J. C. NewellSearch for more papers by this author, D. B. GeselowitzSearch for more papers by this author, J. GobleSearch for more papers by this author, D. IsaacsonSearch for more papers by this author, M. R. HestenesSearch for more papers by this author, G. W. HohmannSearch for more papers by this author, G. N. HounsfieldSearch for more papers by this author, S. S. HubbardSearch for more papers by this author, D. D. JacksonSearch for more papers by this author, G. V. KellerSearch for more papers by this author, F. C. FrischknechtSearch for more papers by this author, A. KemnaSearch for more papers by this author, A. KemnaSearch for more papers by this author, A. M. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, A. KemnaSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, S. H. WardSearch for more papers by this author, S. H. WardSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, G. MorelliSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, P. LundegardSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, X. YangSearch for more papers by this author, D. L. LagerSearch for more papers by this author, R. J. LytleSearch for more papers by this author, V. LesurSearch for more papers by this author, M. CuerSearch for more papers by this author, A. StraubSearch for more papers by this author, Y. LiSearch for more papers by this author, D. W. OldenburgSearch for more papers by this author, W. LinSearch for more papers by this author, M. H. LokeSearch for more papers by this author, R. D. BarkerSearch for more papers by this author, T. LowrySearch for more papers by this author, M. B. AllenSearch for more papers by this author, P. N. ShiveSearch for more papers by this author, P. D. LundegardSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, R. J. LytleSearch for more papers by this author, K. A. DinesSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. MarshallSearch for more papers by this author, T. R. MaddenSearch for more papers by this author, G. MorelliSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, D. W. OldenburgSearch for more papers by this author, Y. LiSearch for more papers by this author, D. W. OldenburgSearch for more papers by this author, Y. LiSearch for more papers by this author, P. A. OlsenSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, S. Henry-PoulterSearch for more papers by this author, W. TychSearch for more papers by this author, S. K. ParkSearch for more papers by this author, G. P. VanSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, R. NewmarkSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, D. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, A. RamirezSearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, J. RobertsSearch for more papers by this author, J. RobertsSearch for more papers by this author, W. LinSearch for more papers by this author, Y. SasakiSearch for more papers by this author, Y. SasakiSearch for more papers by this author, S. SchimaSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, P. D. LundegardSearch for more papers by this author, C. SchlumbergerSearch for more papers by this author, H. ShimaSearch for more papers by this author, H. ShimaSearch for more papers by this author, H. ShimaSearch for more papers by this author, T. SakayamaSearch for more papers by this author, G. ShoreSearch for more papers by this author, L. SlaterSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, D. BrownSearch for more papers by this author, L. SlaterSearch for more papers by this author, M. D. ZaidmanSearch for more papers by this author, A. M. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, L. J. WestSearch for more papers by this author, L. SlaterSearch for more papers by this author, A. BinleySearch for more papers by this author, W. DailySearch for more papers by this author, R. JohnsonSearch for more papers by this author, A. TarantolaSearch for more papers by this author, W. M. TelfordSearch for more papers by this author, L. P. GeldartSearch for more papers by this author, R. E. SheriffSearch for more papers by this author, D. A. KeysSearch for more papers by this author, A. N. TikhonovSearch for more papers by this author, V. Y. ArseninSearch for more papers by this author, A. C. TrippSearch for more papers by this author, G. W. HohmannSearch for more papers by this author, C. M. SwiftSearch for more papers by this author, G. C. Van VoorhisSearch for more papers by this author, P. H. NelsonSearch for more papers by this author, T. L. DrakeSearch for more papers by this author, D. W. VascoSearch for more papers by this author, A. Datta-GuptaSearch for more papers by this author, J. C. S. LongSearch for more papers by this author, J. R. WaitSearch for more papers by this author, M. H. WaxmanSearch for more papers by this author, E. C. ThomasSearch for more papers by this author, M. H. WaxmanSearch for more papers by this author, E. C. ThomasSearch for more papers by this author, J. G. WebsterSearch for more papers by this author, A. WexlerSearch for more papers by this author, B. FrySearch for more papers by this author, M. R. NeumanSearch for more papers by this author, D. WilderSearch for more papers by this author, M. J. WiltSearch for more papers by this author, X. YangSearch for more papers by this author, D. J. LaBrecqueSearch for more papers by this author, T. J. YorkeySearch for more papers by this author, J. G. WebsterSearch for more papers by this author, W. J. TompkinsSearch for more papers by this author, T. J. YorkeySearch for more papers by this author, J. G. WebsterSearch for more papers by this author, W. J. TompkinsSearch for more papers by this author, J. ZhangSearch for more papers by this author, R. L. MackieSearch for more papers by this author, T. MaddenSearch for more papers by this author, S. ZhaoSearch for more papers by this author, M. J. YedlinSearch for more papers by this author, B. ZhouSearch for more papers by this author, and S. A. GreenhalghSearch for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch17 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Historical Development During the last two decades, the United States government has emphasized the environmental remediation of the subsurface contamination which is a legacy of the previous decades of the U.S.-Soviet Cold War. This legacy includes radioactive, chemical, and biological contamination at thousands of sites across the country. The cleanup was, and remains, costly, with many problems solvable only with the development of new technologies. The early development of electrical resistance tomography (ERT) was mainly in response to the need for new technologies to generate high-resolution images of the shallow subsurface. Also, much of the early use of ERT was site characterization or process monitoring for soil and groundwater cleanup. Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch17 References Alumbaugh, D. L. , and G. A. Newman, 2000, Image appraisal for 2-D and 3-D electromagnetic inversion: Geophysics, 65, 1455–1467. AbstractGoogle Scholar Aki, K., A. Christoffersson and E. S. Husebye, 1976, Determination of the three-dimentional seismic structure of the lithosphere: Journal of Geophysical Research, 82, 277–296. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Aki, K., and P. Richards, 1980, Quantitative seismology: Theory and methods: Freeman Press. Google Scholar Anderson, D. L. , and A. M. Dziewonski, 1984, Seismic tomography: Scientific American, 60, 251. Google Scholar Barber, D. C. , B. H. Brown, and I. L. Freeston, 1983, Imaging spatial distributions of resistivity using applied potential tomography: Electronics Letters, 19, 933–935. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Binley, A., A. Ramirez, and W. Daily, 1995, Regularised image reconstruction of noisy electrical resistance tomography data, in M. S. Beck, B. S. Hoyle, M. A. Morris, R. C. Waterfall, and R. A. Williams, eds., Process tomography: Proceedings, 4th Workshop of the European Concerted Action on Process Tomography, 401–410. Google Scholar Binley, A., S. Henry-Poulter, and B. Shaw, 1996, Examination of solute transport in an undisturbed soil column using electrical resistance tomography: Water Resources Research, 32, 763–769. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Binley, A., , 2001a, High resolution of vadose zone dynamics using cross-borehole radar: Water Resources Research, 37, 2639–2652. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Binley, A., P. Winship, M. Pokar, and J. West, 2001b, Cross-borehole radar and resistivity tomography: A comparison of techniques in unsaturated sandstone, in Proceedings of the symposium on applications of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems (SAGEEP2001): Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society. AbstractGoogle Scholar Bing, Z., and S. A. Greenhalgh, 2000, Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations: Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 887–912. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Brown, B. H. , and A. D. Seagar, 1985, Applied potential tomography—Data collection problems, in International conference on electric and magnetic fields in medicine and biology: IEE, 79–82. Google Scholar Carlson, N. R. , C. M. Mayerle, and K. Zonge, 1999, Extremely fast IP used to delineate buried landfills: 5th Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics—European Section, Expanded Abstracts, September 6–9. Google Scholar Coggon, J. H. , 1971, Electromagnetic and electrical modeling by the finite element method: Geophysics, 36, 132–155. AbstractGoogle Scholar Considine, D. M. , 1983, Van Nostrand's scientific encyclopedia, sixth edition: Van Nostrand Reinhold Inc. Google Scholar Christensen, N. B. , and K. Sorensen, 1996, Pulled array continuous vertical electrical sounding (PA-CVES) with an additional inductive source, in R. S. Bell, and M. H. Cramer, eds., Proceedings of the symposium on applications of geophysics to engineering and environmental problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, 1–10. AbstractGoogle Scholar Dahlin, T., 2000, Short note on electrode charge-up effects in DC resistivity data acquisition using multi-electrode arrays: Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 181–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Daily, W., and J. Lytle, 1983, Geophysical tomography: Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, 35, 423–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Daily, W. D. , W. Lin, and T. Buscheck, 1987, Hydrological properties of Topopah Spring tuff: Laboratory measurements: Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 7854–7864. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Daily, W., and E. Owen, 1991, Cross borehole resistivity tomography: Geophysics, 56, 1228–1235. AbstractGoogle Scholar Daily, W., A. Ramirez, D. LaBrecque, and J. Nitao, 1992, Electrical resistivity tomography of vadose water movement: Water Resources Research, 28, 1429–1442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Daily, W., A. Ramirez, R. Newmark, and V. George, 2000, Imaging UXO using electrical impedance tomography: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 5, 11–23. AbstractGoogle Scholar Daily, W., A. Ramirez, and K. Zonge, 1996, A unique data acquisition system for electrical resistance tomography, in Proceedings of the Symposium for the Applications of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, SAGEEP'96. AbstractGoogle Scholar deGroot-Hedlin, C., and Constable, C. S., 1990, Occam's inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric data: Geophysics, 55, 1613–1624. AbstractGoogle Scholar Dey, A., and H. F. Morrison, 1979a, Resistivity modeling for arbitrary shaped three-dimensional structure: Geophysics, 44, 753–780. AbstractGoogle Scholar Dey, A., and H. F. Morrison, 1979b, Resistivity modeling for arbitrarily shaped two-dimensional structures: Geophysical Prospecting, 27, 106–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Dines, K. A. , and R. J. Lytle, 1979, Computerized geophysical tomography: Proceedings of the IEEE, 67, 1065–1073. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ellis, R. G. , and D. W. Oldenburg, 1994, The pole-pole 3D DC resistivity inverse problem: A conjugate gradient approach: Geophysical Journal International, 119, 111–119. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Gisser, D., D. Isaacson, and J. C. Newell, 1987, Current topics in impedance imaging: Clinical Physics and Physiological Measurement, 8, Supplement A, 39–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Geselowitz, D. B. , 1971, An application of electrocardiographic lead theory to impedance plethysmography: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-18, 38–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Goble, J., and D. Isaacson, 1989, Optimal current patterns for three-dimensional electric current computed tomography: Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 11, 463–464. Google Scholar Hestenes, M. R. , 1980, Conjugate direction methods in optimization: Springer-Verlag Inc. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Hohmann, G. W. , 1975, Three-dimensional induced-polarization and electromagnetic modeling: Geophysics, 40, 309–324. (Errata in GEO-50-11-2279) AbstractGoogle Scholar Hounsfield, G. N. , 1973, Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography): Part I. Description of system: British Journal of Radiology, 46, 1016–1022. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Hubbard, S. S. , , 1997, Estimation of permeable pathways and water content using tomographic radar data: The Leading Edge, 1623–1628. AbstractGoogle Scholar Jackson, D. D. , 1972, Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 28, 97–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Keller, G. V. , and F. C. Frischknecht, 1966, Electrical methods in geophysical prospecting: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar Kemna, A., 2000, Tomographic inversion of complex resistivity—Theory and application: Ph.D. thesis, Bochum University. Google Scholar Kemna, A., and Binley, A. M. , 1996, Complex electrical resistivity tomography for contaminant plume delineation: Proceedings of the 2nd Meeting of the Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society, European Section, 196–199. Google Scholar Kemna, A., A. Binley, A. Ramirez, and W. Daily, 2000, Complex resistivity tomography for environmental applications: Chemical Engineering Journal, 77, 11–18. CrossrefGoogle Scholar LaBrecque, D. J. , 1991, IP tomography: 61st Annual International Meeting of the Society of Exploration Geophysics, 413–416. AbstractGoogle Scholar LaBrecque, D. J. , and S. H. Ward, 1990, Two-dimensional cross-borehole resistivity model fitting, in S. H. Ward, ed., Geotechnical and environmental geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysics, 3, 51–74. AbstractGoogle Scholar LaBrecque, D. J. , G. Morelli, A. Ramirez, W. Daily, and P. Lundegard, 1995, Occam's inversion of 3D ERT data: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics 1995, Ridgefield, CT, 471–477. Google Scholar LaBrecque, D. J. , , 1996, The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data: Geophysics, 61, 538–548. AbstractGoogle Scholar LaBrecque, D. J. , and X. Yang, 2000, Difference inversion of ERT data: A fast inversion method for 3D in-situ monitoring, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, 907–914. AbstractGoogle Scholar Lager, D. L. , and R. J. Lytle, 1977, Determining a subsurface electromagnetic profile from high-frequency measurements by applying reconstruction-technique algorithms: Radio Science, 12, 249–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lesur, V., M. Cuer, and A. Straub, 1999, 2D and 3D interpretation of electrical tomography measurements, part 2: The inverse problem: Geophysics, 64, 396–402. AbstractGoogle Scholar Li, Y., and D. W. Oldenburg, 2000, 3D inversion of induced polarization data: Geophysics, 65, 1931–1945. AbstractGoogle Scholar Lin, W., , 1998, An overview of progress on the large block test: International High Level Waste Conference, Rep. UCRL-JC-128796, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Google Scholar Loke, M. H. , and R. D. Barker, 1995, Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method: Geophysical Prospecting, 44, 131–152. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lowry, T., M. B. Allen, and P. N. Shive, 1989, Singularity removal: A refinement of resistivity modeling techniques: Geophysics, 54, 766–774. AbstractGoogle Scholar Lundegard, P. D. , and D. J. LaBrecque, 1995, Air sparging in a sandy aquifer (Florence, Oregon): Actual and apparent radius of influence: Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 19, 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Lytle, R. J. , and K. A. Dines, 1978, An impedance camera: A system for determining the spatial variation of electrical conductivity: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-52413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Marshall, D. J. , and T. R. Madden, 1959, Induced polarization: A study of its causes: Geophysics, 24, 790–816. AbstractGoogle Scholar Morelli, G., and D. J. LaBrecque, 1996, Advances in ERT modeling: European Journal of Environmental Engineering and Geophysics, 1, 171–186. AbstractGoogle Scholar Oldenburg, D. W. , and Y. Li, 1994, Inversion of induced polarization data: Geophysics, 59, 1327–1341. AbstractGoogle Scholar Oldenburg, D. W. , and Y. Li, 1999, Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys: Geophysics, 64, 403–416. AbstractGoogle Scholar Olsen, P. A. , A. Binley, S. Henry-Poulter, and W. Tych, 1999, Characterising solute transport in undisturbed soil cores using electrical and X-ray tomographic methods: Hydrological Processes, 13, 211–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Park, S. K. , and G. P. Van, 1991, Inversion of pole-pole data for 3D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes: Geophysics, 56, 951–960. AbstractGoogle Scholar Ramirez, A., , 1993, Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography: Water Resources Research, 29, 73–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Ramirez, A., W. Daily, and R. Newmark, 1995, Electrical resistance tomography for steam injection monitoring and process control: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 0, 39–51. AbstractGoogle Scholar Ramirez, A., , 1996, Detection of leaks in underground storage tanks using electrical resistance methods, (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory UCRL-JC-122180, October, 1995): Journal of Engineering and Environmental Geophysics, 1, 189–203. AbstractGoogle Scholar Ramirez, A., W. Daily, A. Binley, and D. LaBrecque, 1999, Electrical impedance tomography of known targets: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 4, 11–26. AbstractGoogle Scholar Ramirez, A., and W. Daily, 2001, Electrical imaging of the large block test—Yucca Mountain, Nevada: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 46, 85–100. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Roberts, J., 2001, Electrical properties of Topopah Spring tuff as a function of saturation and temperature: Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-JC-142099. Google Scholar Roberts, J., and W. Lin, 1997, Electrical properties of partially saturated Topopah Spring tuff: Water distribution as a function of saturation: Water Resources Research, 33, 577–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Sasaki, Y., 1989, Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole-dipole resistivity data: Geophysics, 54, 254–262. (Discussion in GEO-54-9-1212-1212 with reply by author) AbstractGoogle Scholar Sasaki, Y., 1994, 3D resistivity inversion using the finite-element method: Geophysics, 59, 1839–1848. AbstractGoogle Scholar Schima, S., D. J. LaBrecque, and P. D. Lundegard, 1996, Using resistivity tomography to monitor air sparging: Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 16, 131–138. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Schlumberger, C., 1920, Etude de la prospection electrique du sous-sol: Gauthiers-Villars. Google Scholar Shima, H., 1990, Two-dimensional automatic resistivity inversion technique using alpha centers: Geophysics, 55, 682–694. AbstractGoogle Scholar Shima, H., 1992, 2D and 3D resistivity image reconstruction using crosshole data: Geophysics, 57, 1270–1281. AbstractGoogle Scholar Shima, H., and T. Sakayama, 1987, Resistivity tomography: An approach to 2D resistivity inverse problems: 57th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, Session: EMI.4. AbstractGoogle Scholar Shore, G., 1992, E-SCAN resource mapping: Multidirectional electrical surveys: Premier Geophysics Inc. Google Scholar Slater, L., A. Binley, and D. Brown, 1997a, Electrical maging of the response of fractures to ground water alinity change: Ground Water, 35, 436–442. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Slater, L., M. D. Zaidman, A. M. Binley and L. J. West, 1997b, Electrical imaging of saline tracer migration for the investigation of unsaturated zone transport mechanisms: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 1, 291–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Slater, L., A. Binley, W. Daily, and R. Johnson, 2000, Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44, 85–102. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Tarantola, A., 1987, Inverse problem theory: Elsevier. Google Scholar Telford, W. M. , L. P. Geldart, R. E. Sheriff, and D. A. Keys, 1976, Applied Geophysics: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar Tikhonov, A. N. , and V. Y. Arsenin, 1977, Solutions of illposed problems: W. H. Winston and Sons. Google Scholar Tripp, A. C. , G. W. Hohmann, and C. M. Swift, 1984, Two dimensional resistivity inversion: Geophysics, 49, 1708–1717. AbstractGoogle Scholar Van Voorhis, G. C. , P. H. Nelson, and T. L. Drake, 1973, Complex resistivity spectra of porphyry copper mineralization: Geophysics, 38, 49–60. AbstractGoogle Scholar Vasco, D. W. , A. Datta-Gupta, and J. C. S. Long, 1997, Resolution and uncertainty in hydrologic characterization: Water Resources Research, 33, 379–397. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Wait, J. R. , 1970, Electromagnetic waves in stratified media: Pergamon Press. Google Scholar Waxman, M. H. , and E. C. Thomas, 1974a, Electrical conductivities in shale sands—I. The relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index: Journal of Petroleum Technology (Feb.) 213–218; Transactions AIME, 257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Waxman, M. H. , and E. C. Thomas, 1974b, Electrical conductivities in shaly sands—II. The relation between hydrocarbon saturation and resistivity index; II. The temperature coefficient of electrical conductivity: Journal of Petroleum Technology (Feb.) 218–225; Transactions AIME, 257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Webster, J. G. (editor), 1990, Electrical impedance tomography: Adam Hilger. Google Scholar Wexler, A., B. Fry, and M. R. Neuman, 1985, Impedance-computed tomography algorithm and system: Applied Optics, 24, 3985–3992. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Wilder, D., , 1997, Large block test status report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, UCRL-ID-128776, August. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Wilt, M. J. , , 1995, Crosswell electromagnetic tomography: System design considerations and field results: Geophysics, 60, 871–885. AbstractGoogle Scholar Yang, X., and D. J. LaBrecque, 1999, Stochastic inversion of 3D ERT data, in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysics Society, 221–228. AbstractGoogle Scholar Yorkey, T. J. , J. G. Webster, and W. J. Tompkins, 1885, Errors caused by contact impedance in impedance imaging, in, IEEE Seventh Annual Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 632–637. Google Scholar Yorkey, T. J. , J. G. Webster and W. J. Tompkins, 1987, Comparing reconstruction algorithms for electrical impedance tomography: IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-34, 843–852. CrossrefGoogle Scholar Zhang, J., R. L. Mackie, and T. Madden, 1995, 3D resistivity forward modeling and inversion using conjugate gradients: Geophysics, 60, 1313–1325. AbstractGoogle Scholar Zhao, S., and M. J. Yedlin, 1995, Some refinements on the finite difference method for 3D DC resistivity modeling: Geophysics, 61, 1301–1307. AbstractGoogle Scholar Zhou, B., and S. A. Greenhalgh, 1997, A synthetic study on cross-hole resistivity imaging with different electrode arrays: Exploration Geophysics, 28, 1–5. CrossrefGoogle ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byTowards a decentralized solution for sewer leakage detection – a review22 August 2022 | Water Science and Technology, Vol. 86, No. 5Monitoring Geologic Carbon Sequestration Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography11 March 2022Substructure Sensing in a Rail Bridge5 August 2021Application of the improved multi-electrode electrical exploration methods for groundwater investigation in Vientiane Province, LaosJournal of Asian Earth Sciences: X, Vol. 5A Comparison of Frequency Domain Electro-Magnetometry, Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Borehole Temperatures to Assess the Presence of Ice in a Rock Glacier22 December 2020 | Frontiers in Earth Science, Vol. 8Borehole effect causing artefacts in cross‐borehole electrical resistivity tomography: A hydraulic fracturing case study2 July 2020 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 18, No. 4Depth Evaluation of Submerged Pile BentsJournal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Vol. 34, No. 1Noninvasive Analysis of Tree Stems by Electrical Resistivity Tomography: Unraveling the Effects of Temperature, Water Status, and Electrode Installation13 November 2019 | Frontiers in Plant Science, Vol. 10Electrical Potential Study of Single and Segmented Excitation for Planar Electrical Capacitance TomographyCorrection of phase errors due to leakage currents in wideband EIT field measurements on soil and sediments28 June 2019 | Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 30, No. 8Application of electrical resistivity tomography technique to delineate a structural failure in an embankment dam: southwest of Iran5 July 2019 | Arabian Journal of Geosciences, Vol. 12, No. 14A decade of detailed observations (2008–2018) in steep bedrock permafrost at the Matterhorn Hörnligrat (Zermatt, CH)13 August 2019 | Earth System Science Data, Vol. 11, No. 3Joint inversion of lake-floor electrical resistivity tomography and boat-towed radio-magnetotelluric data illustrated on synthetic data and an application from the Äspö Hard Rock Laboratory site, Sweden3 October 2017 | Geophysical Journal International, Vol. 213, No. 1Active faulting in a populated low-strain setting (Lower Rhine Graben, Central Europe) identified by geomorphic, geophysical and geological analysis4 August 2016 | Geological Society, London, Special Publications, Vol. 432, No. 1Multi-frequency electrical impedance tomography as a non-invasive tool to characterize and monitor crop root systems28 February 2017 | Biogeosciences, Vol. 14, No. 4Remote Imaging of Proppants in Hydraulic Fracture Networks Using Electromagnetic Methods: Results of Small-Scale Field Experiments1 February 2016Integration of controlled-source and radio magnetotellurics, electric resistivity tomography, and reflection seismics to delineate 3D structures of a quick-clay landslide site in southwest of SwedenChunling Shan, Mehrdad Bastani, Alireza Malehmir, Lena Persson, and Emil Lundberg12 January 2016 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 81, No. 1Integrated 2D modeling and interpretation of geophysical and geotechnical data to delineate quick clays at a landslide site in southwest SwedenChunling Shan, Mehrdad Bastani, Alireza Malehmir, Lena Persson, and Mats Engdahl29 May 2014 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 79, No. 4Dipole magnetics: Using low frequency controlled-source EM to map magnetic anomaliesMichael Wilt, Jiuping Chen, David Alumbaugh, and Amir Rahmani19 August 2013Evaluation of known-boundary and resistivity constraints for improving cross-borehole DC electrical resistivity imaging of discrete fracturesJudith Robinson, Timothy Johnson, and Lee Slater8 April 2013 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 78, No. 33D crosshole ERT for aquifer characterization and monitoring of infiltrating river waterIlaria Coscia, Stewart A. Greenhalgh, Niklas Linde, Joseph Doetsch, Laurent Marescot, Thomas Günther, Tobias Vogt, and Alan G. Green21 March 2011 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 76, No. 2Hydrological consequences of land-cover change: Quantifying the influence of plants on soil moisture with time-lapse electrical resistivityDushmantha H. Jayawickreme, Remke L. Van Dam, and David W. Hyndman30 September 2010 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, No. 4The borehole-fluid effect in electrical resistivity imagingJoseph A. Doetsch, Ilaria Coscia, Stewart Greenhalgh, Niklas Linde, Alan Green, and Thomas Günther31 August 2010 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 75, No. 4Subsurface Tunnel Detection Using Electrical Resistivity Tomography and Seismic Refraction Tomography: A Case StudyGrey I. Riddle, Craig J. Hickey, and Douglas R. Schmitt17 May 2010High-resolution seismic and resistivity profiling of a buried Quaternary subglacial valley: Northern Alberta, Canada28 August 2009 | Geological Society of America Bulletin, Vol. 121, No. 11-12EIT measurement system with high phase accuracy for the imaging of spectral induced polarization properties of soils and sediments24 July 2008 | Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 19, No. 9Assessment of measurement errors for galvanic-resistivity electrodes of different compositionDouglas LaBrecque and William Daily18 January 2008 | GEOPHYSICS, Vol. 73, No. 2Calibration of a Vadose Zone Model Using Water Injection Monitored by GPR and Electrical Resistance Tomography1 February 2008 | Vadose Zone Journal, Vol. 7, No. 1Strategies for Accurate Automated ERT Data AcquisitionDouglas J. LaBrecque, Paula Adkins, and William A. Daily30 September 2008An experiment of non-invasive characterization of the vadose zone via water injection and cross-hole time-lapse geophysical monitoring18 December 2018 | Near Surface Geophysics, Vol. 5, No. 3SOLUTE TRANSPORT PROCESSES Near-Surface GeophysicsISBN (print):978-1-56080-130-6ISBN (online):978-1-56080-171-9Copyright: 2005 Pages: 758 publication data© 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without written permission of the publisherPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished in print: 01 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION William Daily, Abelardo Ramirez, Andrew Binley, and Douglas LaBrecque, (2005), 17. Electrical Resistance Tomography—Theory and Practice, Investigations in Geophysics : 525-550. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch17 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W99385433 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W99385433 creator A5000009056 @default.
• W99385433 creator A5010515329 @default.
• W99385433 creator A5017825250 @default.
• W99385433 creator A5080999067 @default.
• W99385433 date "2005-01-01" @default.
• W99385433 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W99385433 title "17. Electrical Resistance Tomography—Theory and Practice" @default.
• W99385433 cites W1483689974 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1669319665 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1967675896 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1969565289 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1976730797 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1979724394 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1981817749 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1984284332 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1985677935 @default.
• W99385433 cites W1987596368 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2003361868 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2012163911 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2023852903 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2024546002 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2032658341 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2038725803 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2039635636 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2040906461 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2045797517 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2045998234 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2048523439 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2053461334 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2054999444 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2056443691 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2059072408 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2060140963 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2061800010 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2062419281 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2066186281 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2067668357 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2070845770 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2073318058 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2077198683 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2077204104 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2083123624 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2083822644 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2084320638 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2085341126 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2091520581 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2103199518 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2105403290 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2106575668 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2106656281 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2107739469 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2108448944 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2112262385 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2113065253 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2113075737 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2114821683 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2123169298 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2124048760 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2128274957 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2130716416 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2142113627 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2142552253 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2144118383 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2144311857 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2146312732 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2146801751 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2148633857 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2152242052 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2168250179 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2168298836 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2327322051 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2498238563 @default.
• W99385433 cites W2522083270 @default.
• W99385433 cites W3017464178 @default.
• W99385433 cites W4232829756 @default.
• W99385433 cites W4236150644 @default.
• W99385433 cites W4238758085 @default.
• W99385433 cites W4246422315 @default.
• W99385433 cites W4246605380 @default.
• W99385433 doi "https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560801719.ch17" @default.
• W99385433 hasPublicationYear "2005" @default.
• W99385433 type Work @default.
• W99385433 sameAs 99385433 @default.
• W99385433 citedByCount "35" @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332012 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332013 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332014 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332015 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332016 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332017 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332019 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332020 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332021 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332022 @default.
• W99385433 countsByYear W993854332023 @default.
• W99385433 crossrefType "book-chapter" @default.

• next