FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W99389879> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W99389879 endingPage "31" @default.
• W99389879 startingPage "525" @default.
• W99389879 abstract "To evaluate the different efficacy and safety to the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis between the fluoroquinolone antibiotics gatifloxacin and levofloxacin.A multi-centre, random, double-blind and control trial was performed in six centers including Eye Ear Nose and Throat Hospital of Fudan University, Henan Eye Institute, Eye Hospital Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical College, the First Affiliated Hospital Of Nanjing Medical University, Xijing Hospital Affiliated to the Fourth Military Medical University, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between August 2006 and October 2007. The levofloxacin was set as the efficient control. Two hundred and thirty-five patients (235 eyes) that diagnosed as bacterial conjunctivitis were randomly divided into two groups by the method of randomized blocks, the test group (gatifloxacin) had 118 eyes and the control (levofloxacin) group had 117 eyes. The drug delivery into conjunctival sac was performed at a 7-day period (two drops per time, eight times per day at the first two days and two drops per time, four times per day at the following 5 days). All participants were given the conjunctival sac germ culture and drug sensitive test before and after the study. The combination score of signs and symptoms and evaluation of safety were conducted at the pre-delivery day, the (4 ± 1) and (7 ± 1) delivery day. The statistic analysis was conducted by CMH χ(2) test, Pearson χ(2) test and Fisher's exact probabilities test.The efficacy of the two groups was 94.0% (110/117 eyes) in gatifloxacin group and 93.8% (106/113 eyes) in levofloxacin group with no significant difference (χ(2) = 0.052, P = 0.8201). There was also no difference in the bacteria clearance between the two groups [gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin, 94.1% (80/85 eyes) versus 92.5% (74/80 eyes), P = 0.3470]. The decrease of combination score of signs and symptoms at the (4 ± 1) delivery day was 4.436 ± 2.310 in the gatifloxacin group and 3.814 ± 1.962 in the levofloxacin group, the difference of which was significant (F = 7.280, P = 0.0075). This trend was also proved at the (7 ± 1) delivery day (gatifloxacin versus levofloxacin, 7.487 ± 2.821 versus 6.912 ± 2.911, F = 4.060, P = 0.0452). The visual acuity and the tolerance after local application of the eye drops between the two groups had no difference (the visual acuity F = 1.04, P = 0.3080; the tolerance after local admission χ(2) = 0.1372, P = 0.7111). According to the result of the germ culture, the major pathogenic bacteria were Gram-positive bacteria (totally 20 kinds of Gram-positive bacteria and 8 kinds of Gram-negative bacteria). The MIC and drug resistance of gatifloxacin to the Gram-positive bacteria was lower than that of the levofloxacin (Staphylococcus Epidermidis, Staphylococcus Aureus, coagulase negative Staphylococcus, α-hemolytic Streptococcus).The gatifloxacin eye drop has a good therapeutic effect to the bacterial conjunctivitis. It can effectively clear the pathogen with fast and strong effect. Moreover, it has a low MIC in vitro, advance a prospect in drug resistance, safety and ocular tolerance." @default.
• W99389879 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W99389879 creator A5001889225 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5013781784 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5043332372 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5057558848 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5068842292 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5071706247 @default.
• W99389879 creator A5083424856 @default.
• W99389879 date "2010-06-01" @default.
• W99389879 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W99389879 title "[Comparative research of the efficacy of the gatifloxacin and levofloxacin for bacterial conjunctivitis in human eyes]." @default.
• W99389879 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21055198" @default.
• W99389879 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W99389879 type Work @default.
• W99389879 sameAs 99389879 @default.
• W99389879 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W99389879 countsByYear W993898792013 @default.
• W99389879 countsByYear W993898792015 @default.
• W99389879 countsByYear W993898792020 @default.
• W99389879 countsByYear W993898792022 @default.
• W99389879 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5001889225 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5013781784 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5043332372 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5057558848 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5068842292 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5071706247 @default.
• W99389879 hasAuthorship W99389879A5083424856 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C118487528 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C189539697 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C2777653605 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C2781276175 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C501593827 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C523546767 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C54355233 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W99389879 hasConcept C89423630 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C118487528 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C141071460 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C168563851 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C189539697 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C2777653605 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C2781276175 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C501593827 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C523546767 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C54355233 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C71924100 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C86803240 @default.
• W99389879 hasConceptScore W99389879C89423630 @default.
• W99389879 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W99389879 hasLocation W993898791 @default.
• W99389879 hasOpenAccess W99389879 @default.
• W99389879 hasPrimaryLocation W993898791 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W108399861 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W1980706046 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W1991371427 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W1993182636 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2069894300 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2089557636 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2124899117 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2132326533 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2348055327 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2353225762 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2358585339 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2361599392 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2361929353 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2373881660 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2379692333 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2380192441 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2394104505 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2413806661 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2578165466 @default.
• W99389879 hasRelatedWork W2608791217 @default.
• W99389879 hasVolume "46" @default.
• W99389879 isParatext "false" @default.
• W99389879 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W99389879 magId "99389879" @default.
• W99389879 workType "article" @default.