FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W99974550> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W99974550 abstract "Though H.L.A. Hart’s The Concept of Law has played a central role in jurisprudential debate since its publication in 1961, there has been little interest in using his scheme to analyze the American constitutional system. In recent years, however, scholars have focused on Hart’s “rule of recognition,” which defines a legal system’s basic standard of legal validity, to address two interconnected issues: whether Hart’s scheme is useful in analyzing the American constitutional democracy and whether this analytical endeavor provides support for Hart’s conceptual framework.This Article uses the American experience with the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment to address both issues. This context provides a concrete framework for analyzing abstract jurisprudential concepts that is especially useful because it involves a classic jurisprudential challenge: How is it possible to use legal protections of property rights to control government, which is empowered not only to establish and coercively enforce property rights but also to impose limits on those rights? This experience also illustrates an area where citizens have used their legal rights to secure greater protection for a constitutional right through the political process than that granted by the Supreme Court.As to the first question, the Article concludes that Hart’s analysis of the nature and types of rules helps our understanding of the way takings law has developed. In particular, it illustrates that, largely because of the limits on human ability to foresee the future and to communicate standards, the Constitution must be interpreted and adapted to constantly changing circumstances as it is applied to property rights. As a result of this process, officials have created an unwritten constitution that is based on and supplements the written Constitution. On the second question, the Article concludes that Hart’s method of focusing on the elements shared by all legal systems is questionable and that, in two respects, his theory fails to achieve his goal of providing a morally neutral descriptive model that applies to all legal systems: (1) His view that official discretion is constrained by an internal sense of obligation to respect certain rule-based duties renders the model inapplicable not only to totalitarian legal systems but also to systems, like the United States, which use direct citizen participation in adopting and applying rules; and (2) his use of the distinction between citizens and officials does not apply to systems that grant citizens direct decision making powers." @default.
• W99974550 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W99974550 creator A5066637733 @default.
• W99974550 date "2011-01-01" @default.
• W99974550 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W99974550 title "Power to the People: The Takings Clause, Hart's Rule of Recognition, and Populist Law-Making" @default.
• W99974550 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W99974550 type Work @default.
• W99974550 sameAs 99974550 @default.
• W99974550 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W99974550 crossrefType "posted-content" @default.
• W99974550 hasAuthorship W99974550A5066637733 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C126806153 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C140280474 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C169437150 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C170706310 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C18650270 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C190253527 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C2776154427 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C2778272461 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C30048959 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C86511162 @default.
• W99974550 hasConcept C95691615 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C126806153 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C140280474 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C144024400 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C169437150 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C170706310 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C17744445 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C18650270 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C190253527 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C199539241 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C2776154427 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C2778272461 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C30048959 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C86511162 @default.
• W99974550 hasConceptScore W99974550C95691615 @default.
• W99974550 hasLocation W999745501 @default.
• W99974550 hasOpenAccess W99974550 @default.
• W99974550 hasPrimaryLocation W999745501 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W1776100733 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2052748386 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2083825441 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2131864997 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2156603572 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2223428260 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2242720791 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2312080604 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W244974054 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2765732806 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2904004015 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2990775957 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W3093402298 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W3125179470 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W3159764713 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W1942194301 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2111531084 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W2189900393 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W3117473045 @default.
• W99974550 hasRelatedWork W3123313766 @default.
• W99974550 isParatext "false" @default.
• W99974550 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W99974550 magId "99974550" @default.
• W99974550 workType "article" @default.